Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, S. T.
(Radiology. 1999;210:437-442.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Acute Pancreatic Transplant Rejection: Evaluation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Compared with Histopathologic Analysis

Thorsten L. Krebs, MD1, Barry Daly, MD1, Jade J. Wong-You-Cheong, MD1, Kieran Carroll, MB1 and Stephen T. Bartlett, MD2

1 Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.L.K., B.D., J.J.W.Y.C., K.C.)
2 Surgery (S.T.B.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of dynamic contrast material–enhanced gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging for the diagnosis of acute pancreatic transplant rejection, as confirmed at histopathologic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty MR imaging studies were performed in 25 patients within 3 days of percutaneous biopsy or pancreatectomy. The mean percentage of parenchymal enhancement (MPPE) at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was calculated.

RESULTS: Biopsy findings were no evidence of rejection (n = 7 [23%]), mild rejection (n = 10 [33%]), moderate (n = 6 [20%]) and severe (n = 2 [7%]) acute rejection, and infarction (n = 5 [17%]). The corresponding MPPEs at 1 minute were 106%, 66%, 62%, 57%, and 3%, respectively. Overlap of cases in the normal and rejection groups occurred; however, using an MPPE cutoff of 100% resulted in a sensitivity of 96%. An MPPE over 120% was seen in the normal group only. The MPPE was significantly greater in the normal group than in the rejection or infarction group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is highly sensitive for the detection of acute pancreatic transplant rejection. Because of overlap of cases in the normal and rejection groups, percutaneous biopsy may be needed in some cases. Pancreatic allografts with infarction can be clearly identified.

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement, 77.121412, 77.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), tissue characterization, 77.121412, 77.12143 • Pancreas, MR, 77.121412, 77.12143, 77.12144, 77.12146 • Pancreas, transplantation, 77.458




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. Hagspiel, K. Nandalur, T. L. Pruett, D. A. Leung, J. F. Angle, D. J. Spinosa, A. H. Matsumoto, H. Ahmed, H. A. Sanfey, R. G. Sawyer, et al.
Evaluation of Vascular Complications of Pancreas Transplantation with High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 590 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. Dobos, D. A. Roberts, E. K. Insko, E. S. Siegelman, A. Naji, and J. F. Markmann
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography for Evaluation of Vascular Complications of the Pancreatic Transplant
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 687 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. D. Hagspiel, K. Nandalur, B. Burkholder, J. F. Angle, K. L. Brayman, D. J. Spinosa, A. H. Matsumoto, O. L. Veldhuis, H. Sanfey, R. G. Sawyer, et al.
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography After Pancreas Transplantation: Normal Appearance and Vascular Complications
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 465 - 473.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. T. Heverhagen, H.-J. Wagner, H. Ebel, A. L. Levine, K. J. Klose, and A. Hellinger
Pancreatic Transplants: Noninvasive Evaluation with Secretin-augmented MR Pancreatography and MR Perfusion Measurements--Preliminary Results
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. Freund, W. Steurer, E. M. Gassner, K. M. Unsinn, M. Rieger, A. Koenigsrainer, R. Margreiter, and W. R. Jaschke
Spectrum of Imaging Findings After Pancreas Transplantation with Enteric Exocrine Drainage: Part 2, Posttransplantation Complications
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 919 - 925.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Johansson, C. Johnsson, E. Penno, A. Bjornerud, and H. Ahlstrom
Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection: Detection and Grading with MR Imaging with a Blood Pool Contrast Agent—Experimental Study in the Rat
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 97 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Green, P S Sidhu, and C R Deane
Imaging of simultaneous kidney pancreatic transplants
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 299 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Hariharan, J. D. Pirsch, C. Y. Lu, L. Chan, T. E. Pesavento, S. Alexander, G. L. Bumgardner, G. Baasadona, D. E. Hricik, M. D. Pescovitz, et al.
Pancreas after Kidney Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 1109 - 1118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. B. Eubank, U. P. Schmiedl, A. E. Levy, and C. L. Marsh
Venous Thrombosis and Occlusion After Pancreas Transplantation: Evaluation with Breath-Hold Gadolinium-Enhanced Three-Dimensional MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.