Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Youssefzadeh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kainberger, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Youssefzadeh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kainberger, F. M.
(Radiology. 1999;210:545-549.)
© RSNA, 1999


Head and Neck Imaging

Dental Vertical Root Fractures: Value of CT in Detection

Soraya Youssefzadeh, MD1, André Gahleitner, MD1, Roland Dorffner, MD1, Thomas Bernhart, MD2 and Franz M. Kainberger, MD1

1 Departments of Radiology (S.Y., A.G., R.D., F.M.K.)
2 Oral Surgery (T.B.), University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of dental vertical root fractures relative to the value of conventional dental radiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with 42 teeth in which vertical root fracture was clinically suspected underwent dental radiography and axial CT. Two radiologists evaluated the images independently and by consensus for a fracture line. The results were compared with intraoperative findings.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 42 teeth were proved intraoperatively to be fractured. The sensitivity and specificity averaged for the two reviewers in the assessment of vertical fractures were 23% and 70%, respectively, with dental radiography and 100% and 100%, respectively, with CT. Consensus reading showed sensitivities of 25% for dental radiography and 75% for CT. Eight (reviewer A) or nine (reviewer B) false-negative CT findings were encountered in cases in which metallic artifacts obscured parts of the root and in cases in which the root was very small in diameter. Interobserver agreement was 95% for dental radiography and 93% for CT.

CONCLUSION: CT is superior to dental radiography in the detection of dental vertical root fractures.

Index terms: Fractures, 25.4153 • Jaws, CT, 24.1211 • Teeth, 25.1211, 25.4153




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
A. Suomalainen, A Salo, S Robinson, and J. Peltola
The 3DX multi image micro-CT device in clinical dental practice
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 36(2): 80 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
O.A. Peters, A. Laib, P. Ruegsegger, and F. Barbakow
Three-dimensional Analysis of Root Canal Geometry by High-resolution Computed Tomography
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2000; 79(6): 1405 - 1409.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.