Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sica, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sica, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
(Radiology. 1999;210:605-610.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with MR Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Pancreatitis

Gregory T. Sica, MD1, John Braver, MD1, Michael J. Cooney, MD2,1, Frank H. Miller, MD3,1, Jessie L. Chai, MD1 and Douglass F. Adams, MD1

1 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the evaluation of disease in patients with acute or chronic pancreatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T in 39 patients with chronic (n = 30) or acute (n = 9) pancreatitis. The patients underwent a pancreas MR imaging protocol that included an MRCP sequence. Comparison was made with findings at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), performed within 30 days. Three blinded readers used a scoring system to evaluate nine segments of the pancreatic and biliary ducts as depicted on the ERCP and MRCP images. MRCP image quality was also evaluated.

RESULTS: Of 196 segments analyzed, 17 were not seen at MRCP (sensitivity, 91%). Of the segments visualized at MRCP, 14 were incorrectly characterized (accuracy, 92%). At MRCP, segments not detected or mischaracterized were either normal, slightly dilated, or narrowed. At ERCP, 42 segments in 19 patients were not visualized. MRCP findings were considered useful in all those cases. MRCP image quality was not interpretable in two cases due to artifacts.

CONCLUSION: Very good correlation between ERCP and MRCP findings was demonstrated. Both modalities failed to depict pathologic conditions depicted by the alternative method. MRCP may obviate ERCP, particularly in patients who cannot undergo ERCP or in whom ERCP has been unsuccessful.

Index terms: Bile ducts, MR, 76.12117, 76.12149 • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 77.1222 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 76.12117, 76.12149 • Magnetic resonance (MR), rapid imaging, 77.121416 • Pancreatic ducts, 774.297 • Pancreatitis, 77.291




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tamura, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Chronic Pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for Quantitative Caliber Measurement and Qualitative Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Schroeder, A. Radtke, H. Kuehl, J. F. Debatin, M. Malago, and S. G. Ruehm
Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 900 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. H. Miller, A. L. Keppke, A. Wadhwa, J. N. Ly, K. Dalal, and V.-A. Kamler
MRI of Pancreatitis and Its Complications: Part 2, Chronic Pancreatitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1645 - 1652.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Messiou and A G Chalmers
Imaging in acute pancreatitis
Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 314 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Romagnuolo, M. Bardou, E. Rahme, L. Joseph, C. Reinhold, and A. N. Barkun
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 547 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P D Thomas, A Forbes, J Green, P Howdle, R Long, R Playford, M Sheridan, R Stevens, R Valori, J Walters, et al.
Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea, 2nd edition
Gut, July 1, 2003; 52(90005): v1 - 15.
[Full Text]


Home page
GutHome page
W Schwizer, M Fox, and A Steingotter
Non-invasive investigation of gastrointestinal functions with magnetic resonance imaging: towards an "ideal" investigation of gastrointestinal function
Gut, June 1, 2003; 52(90004): iv34 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Schroeder, S. Nadalin, J. Stattaus, J. F. Debatin, M. Malago, and S. G. Ruehm
Potential Living Liver Donors: Evaluation with an All-in-One Protocol with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 586 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Hellerhoff, H. Helmberger III, T. Rosch, M. R. Settles, T. M. Link, and E. J. Rummeny
Dynamic MR Pancreatography After Secretin Administration: Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 121 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Cappeliez, M. Delhaye, J. Devière, O. Le Moine, T. Metens, N. Nicaise, M. Cremer, J. Stryuven, and C. Matos
Chronic Pancreatitis: Evaluation of Pancreatic Exocrine Function with MR Pancreatography after Secretin Stimulation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Fukukura, F. Fujiyoshi, M. Sasaki, and M. Nakajo
Pancreatic Duct: Morphologic Evaluation with MR Cholangiopancreatography after Secretin Stimulation
Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 674 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.