Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medina, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medina, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.
(Radiology. 1999;211:767-771.)
© RSNA, 1999


Pediatric Imaging

Occult Lumbosacral Dysraphism in Children and Young Adults: Diagnostic Performance of Fast Screening and Conventional MR Imaging1

L. Santiago Medina, MD, MPH, May Al-Orfali, MD, David Zurakowski, PhD, Tina Young Poussaint, MD, James DiCanzio, MS and Patrick D. Barnes, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Health Services and Policy Section, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45236 (L.S.M.), and the Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass (M.A.O., D.Z., T.Y.P., J.D., P.D.B.). Received January 27, 1998; revision requested April 7; revision received September 11; accepted November 9. Address reprint requests to L.S.M.

PURPOSE: To compare fast screening and conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of occult dysraphic myelodysplasias in children and young adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study included 101 patients (mean age, 4.9 years; range, 1 day to 26 years) suspected of having occult lumbosacral dysraphism. Sixty case patients had myelodysplastic lesions (19 filar lipoma, 14 syringomyelia, 10 intradural lipoma, eight dermal sinus, five diastematomyelia, five lipomyelomeningocele, two caudal regression syndrome); 41 control patients had no dysraphic lesions; 17 patients had associated renal anomalies. Two neuroradiologists reviewed MR images from conventional and fast screening protocols. Diagnostic performance parameters included sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az value).

RESULTS: The sensitivity of conventional and fast screening MR studies was 97.1% and 98.5%, respectively; the specificity was 90.9% and 84.8%, respectively. The Az value was 0.973 for the fast screening and 0.976 for the conventional MR studies (P = .83). Interobserver agreement was very good for fast screening images ({kappa} = 0.68) and excellent for conventional images ({kappa} = 0.75). For renal anomalies, the Az value was 0.786 and 0.853 for fast screening and conventional MR imaging, respectively (P = .28).

CONCLUSION: Conventional three-plane lumbosacral MR imaging in children and young adults suspected of having occult dysraphism provides better diagnostic information than does fast screening two-plane MR imaging because of its higher specificity and interobserver agreement.

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), in infants and children • Spinal cord, developmental defect, 33.145, 33.148, 33.361 • Spinal cord, MR, 33.121411 • Spinal cord, neoplasms, 33.361, 33.368, 33.369




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Khanna, T. R. Yoon, M. A. Mont, D. S. Hungerford, and D. A. Bluemke
Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Detection and Grading by Using a Rapid MR Imaging Protocol
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 188 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.