|
|
||||||||
Breast Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (S.G.O., S.P.W., M.D.S.), Surgery (D.L.F.), and Radiation Oncology (L.J.S.) and the Hematology-Oncology Division (L.M.S.), University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and the Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.A.R.). Received July 8, 1998; revision requested August 18; final revision received October 22; accepted February 10, 1999. Address reprint requests to S.G.O. (e-mail: orel@oasis.rad.upenn.edu).
PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast in patients with malignant axillary adenopathy and unknown primary malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1993 and December 1997, 38 women with malignant axillary adenopathy and negative mammographic and physical examination findings underwent contrast materialenhanced MR imaging. Sixteen patients were excluded due to axillary tail cancer (n = 7), lack of follow-up (n = 4), second primary malignancy (n = 3), or chemotherapy before MR imaging (n = 2). The study population comprised the remaining 22 patients. Histopathologic findings were available in 20 patients; follow-up MR imaging findings were available in two patients.
RESULTS: MR imaging depicted a primary breast cancer in 19 patients (86%; identified at excisional biopsy or mastectomy in 17, resolved on follow-up MR images during treatment in two). MR imaging depicted 430-mm cancers (mean, 17 mm), which correlated closely with histopathologic size. Two patients (9%) had false-negative findings: (a) One had a 2-mm invasive ductal carcinoma, and (b) one had 17- and 20-mm invasive ductal carcinomas. Of the 19 patients, 11 underwent mastectomy, seven underwent breast-conservation therapy, and one did not undergo a surgical procedure.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging is very sensitive for the detection of mammographically and clinically occult breast cancer in patients with malignant axillary adenopathy. In these patients, MR imaging offers potential not only for cancer detection but also for staging the cancer within the breast, which may be useful for treatment planning.
Index terms: Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.121412, 00.121415, 00.12143, 00.30 Breast neoplasms, localization, 00.121412, 00.121415, 00.12143, 00.30 Breast neoplasms, metastases, 997.33 Breast neoplasms, MR, 00.121412, 00.121415, 00.12143, 00.30 Breast neoplasms, staging, 00.30
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Moy and C. L. Mercado Interpretation and Clinical Applications of Breast MRI: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6_Supplement): S60 - S67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Horlings, R. K. van Laar, J.-M. Kerst, H. H. Helgason, J. Wesseling, J. J.M. van der Hoeven, M. O. Warmoes, A. Floore, A. Witteveen, J. Lahti-Domenici, et al. Gene Expression Profiling to Identify the Histogenetic Origin of Metastatic Adenocarcinomas of Unknown Primary J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2008; 26(27): 4435 - 4441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Orel Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation? J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Solin, S. G. Orel, W.-T. Hwang, E. E. Harris, and M. D. Schnall Relationship of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Outcome After Breast-Conservation Treatment With Radiation for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Carcinoma or Ductal Carcinoma in Situ J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Williams, W. B. DeMartini, S. C. Partridge, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 94 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Shah, S. K. Shah, and K. V. Greatrex Current Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Imaging: A Primer for the Primary Care Physician J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 478 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hylton Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Opportunities to Improve Breast Cancer Management J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1678 - 1684. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Mintzer, M. Warhol, A.-M. Martin, and G. Greene Cancer of Unknown Primary: Changing Approaches. A Multidisciplinary Case Presentation from the Joan Karnell Cancer Center of Pennsylvania Hospital Oncologist, June 1, 2004; 9(3): 330 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Bagley The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mammography in the Surgical Management of the Index Breast Cancer Arch Surg, April 1, 2004; 139(4): 380 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Majid, E. S. de Paredes, R. D. Doherty, N. R. Sharma, and X. Salvador Missed Breast Carcinoma: Pitfalls and Pearls RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 881 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. LaTrenta, J. H. Menell, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, D. D. Dershaw, and L. Liberman Breast Lesions Detected with MR Imaging: Utility and Histopathologic Importance of Identification with US Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 856 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. UDAGAWA, A. FERNANDEZ, E.-G. ACHILLES, J. FOLKMAN, and R. J. D'AMATO Persistence of microscopic human cancers in mice: alterations in the angiogenic balance accompanies loss of tumor dormancy FASEB J, September 1, 2002; 16(11): 1361 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Tillman, S. G. Orel, M. D. Schnall, D. J. Schultz, J. E. Tan, and L. J. Solin Effect of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Clinical Management of Women With Early-Stage Breast Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2002; 20(16): 3413 - 3423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bedrosian, J. Schlencker, F. R. Spitz, S. G. Orel, D. L. Fraker, L. S. Callans, M. Schnall, C. Reynolds, and B. J. Czerniecki Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy of Mammographically and Clinically Occult Breast Lesions Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2002; 9(5): 457 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. D. Dershaw, J. B. Kaplan, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. J. Ballon Preoperative MR Imaging--Guided Needle Localization of Breast Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1211 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Weinstein, S. G. Orel, R. Heller, C. Reynolds, B. Czerniecki, L. J. Solin, and M. Schnall MR Imaging of the Breast in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-M. A. Obdeijn, E. M. J. Brouwers-Kuyper, M. M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, T. Wiggers, and M. Oudkerk MR Imaging-Guided Sonography Followed by Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Occult Carcinoma of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |