Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potchen, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potchen, E. J.
(Radiology. 2000;214:623-629.)
© RSNA, 2000

Reflections

Reflections on the Early Years of Nuclear Medicine1

E. James Potchen, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, 160 Radiology Bldg, East Lansing, MI 48824. Received August 31, 1999; revision requested October 6; revision received October 26; accepted October 28. Address reprint requests to the author (e-mail: Jim.Potchen@radiology.msu.edu).

Abstract

In the early years of nuclear medicine, physicians explored applied nuclear physics, and physicists pursued uncharted areas in medicine. Reflections from Jim Adelstein, MD, PhD, John McAfee, MD, Henry Wagner, MD, Fred Bonte, MD, Dave Kuhl, MD, and Alex Gottschalk, MD, add to the appreciation of the diversity in those early years. These reflections may serve many purposes. For some, they may provoke nostalgia for the better life gone by. For others, reflections may create an awareness of the people and the process of what it took to be where we are today. For still others, this may provide some impetus to better understand the origins of modern imaging technologies and their diffusion. Which techniques in use today will be in use 30 years from now? Why will some survive and others go by the wayside? From research into the process of technology transfer and diffusion, can we learn to put our efforts today where they will have the greatest benefits to human beings some 30 years from now? How can we maximize the present value of our efforts to improve diagnostic imaging? Reflections from the past may help.

Index terms: Radiology and radiologists, history • Radionuclide imaging • Radionuclides • Reflections






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.