Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leone, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marano, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leone, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marano, P.
(Radiology. 2000;216:635-644.)
© RSNA, 2000


Review

Occipital Condylar Fractures: A Review1

Antonio Leone, MD, Alfonso Cerase, MD 2, Cesare Colosimo, MD, Luigi Lauro, MD, Alfredo Puca, MD and Pasquale Marano, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (A.L., A.C., C.C, L.L., P.M.) and Neurosurgery (A.P.), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico "Agostino Gemelli," Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. Received January 12, 1999; revision requested March 5; final revision received September 13; accepted September 14. Address correspondence to A.L. (e-mail: a.leonemd@tiscalinet.it).

The purpose of this review article is to summarize the epidemiology, pertinent anatomy, mechanisms of injury, and classification systems of occipital condylar fractures (OCFs), as well as their clinical presentation and screening, the importance of computed tomography (CT) for detection, and current treatment options. The authors emphasize the rate of occurrence of OCFs, which may be detected in as many as 16% of patients with craniocervical injury. Clinical presentation is not specific, and OCF is not readily diagnosed at physical examination. Failure to diagnose may result in substantial morbidity, and thus accurate diagnosis is mandatory for both therapeutic and medicolegal implications. The diagnosis is most likely to be made with CT. Thin-section CT technique is the method of choice to evaluate the traumatized craniocervical junction. OCFs should be suspected in all patients sustaining high-energy blunt trauma to the head and/or upper cervical spine, resulting from axial loading, lateral bending and/or rotation, and/or direct blow. Besides a CT study assessing potential intracranial injuries, these patients require CT of the craniocervical junction. Radiologists should be aware of the types of OCFs and associated injuries.

Index terms: Review • Skull, base, 127.41 • Skull, fractures, 127.41 • Trauma, 127.41




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. A. Hanson, A. V. Deliganis, A. B. Baxter, W. A. Cohen, K. F. Linnau, A. J. Wilson, and F. A. Mann
Radiologic and Clinical Spectrum of Occipital Condyle Fractures: Retrospective Review of 107 Consecutive Fractures in 95 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1261 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.