|
|
||||||||
Breast Imaging |
1 From the Dept of Radiology, Univ of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, 515 Old Infirmary, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510 (E.D.P.); Dept of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, Md (L.L.F.); Dept of Pathology, M.D. Anderson Comprehensive Cancer Ctr, Houston, Tex (N.S.); Dept of Pathology, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond (W.J.F.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ, Providence, RI (C.A.G.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Maryland, Baltimore (W.A.B.); Dept of Radiology, Yale Univ, New Haven, Conn (I.T.); Depts of Pathology (S.J.S., J.L.C.) and Health Care Policy (D.J.C., B.J.M.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Dept of Radiology, Brigham and Womens Hosp and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (B.J.M.). The radiologist investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V (RDOGV) and their affiliations are listed at the end of this article. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received Aug 15, 2000; revision requested Sep 26; revision received Nov 8; accepted Dec 12. Supported by NIH grants UO1 CA62476, UO1 CA62514, UO1 CA62462. Address correspondence to E.D.P. (e-mail: etpisano@med.unc.edu).
PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographically (US) and stereotactically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 18 institutions, 442 women who underwent 2225-gauge imaging-guided FNAB were enrolled. Definitive surgical, core-needle biopsy, and/or follow-up information was available for 423 (95.7%) of these women. The reference standard was established from additional clinical and imaging information for an additional six (1.4%) women who did not undergo further histopathologic evaluation. The FNAB protocol was standardized at all institutions, and all specimens were reread by one of two expert cytopathologists.
RESULTS: When insufficient samples were included in the analysis and classified as positive, the sensitivity and specificity of FNAB were 85%88% and 55.6%90.5%, respectively; accuracy ranged from 62.2% to 89.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAB was significantly better for detection of masses than for detection of calcifications (67.3% vs 53.8%, P = .006) and with US guidance than with stereotactic guidance (77.2% vs 58.9%; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: FNAB of nonpalpable breast lesions has limited value given the high insufficient sample rate and greater diagnostic accuracy of other interventions, including core-needle biopsy and needle-localized open surgical biopsy.
Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.126 Breast neoplasms, 00.31. 00.32 Breast neoplasms, US, 00.12985 Stereotaxis, 00.1267
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Doshi, D. E. March, G. M. Crisi, and B. F. Coughlin Complex Cystic Breast Masses: Diagnostic Approach and Imaging-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S53 - S64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack, E. B. Mendelson, and E. L. Madsen Lesion Detection and Characterization in a Breast US Phantom: Results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 693 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M Kymes, K. Lee, J. W Fletcher, and SNAP (CSP 027) Study Group Assessing diagnostic accuracy and the clinical value of positron emission tomography imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SNAP) Clinical Trials, February 1, 2006; 3(1): 31 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Szopinski, A. M. Pajk, M. Wysocki, D. Amy, M. Szopinska, and W. Jakubowski Tissue Harmonic Imaging: Utility in Breast Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2003; 22(5): 479 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, C. I. Campassi, and O. B. Ioffe Cystic Lesions of the Breast: Sonographic-Pathologic Correlation Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 183 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |