Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2211001537
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welker, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welker, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C. E.
(Radiology. 2001;221:11-25.)
© RSNA, 2001


How I Do It

Radio-frequency Coil Selection for MR Imaging of the Brain and Skull Base1

Kirk M. Welker, MD, Jay S. Tsuruda, MD, J. Rock Hadley, MSEE and Cecil E. Hayes, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (K.M.W., J.S.T., J.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle (C.E.H.). From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 15, 2000; revision requested October 24; revision received January 30, 2001; accepted February 6. Supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01HL48223 and R01HL53596. J.S.T. supported in part by GE Medical Systems. C.E.H. supported in part by Pathway MRI (formerly Ultraimage). Address correspondence to K.M.W., Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA 23708 (e-mail: kmwelker@pnh10.med.navy.mil).

Radio-frequency coils play a crucial role in the quest for optimal magnetic resonance (MR) image resolution. Given the growing variety of specialized coils available for neuroradiologic imaging applications, it is critical that radiologists use a coherent strategy for successfully matching these coils to specific imaging situations. First, fundamental concepts of coil design are reviewed. Subsequently, a coil-selection algorithm for neuroimaging applications is described. The algorithm uses the patient’s clinical history to derive a region of interest, a desired spatial resolution, and a desired contrast resolution. These factors are then used to impose anatomic coverage and imaging protocol constraints on the set of available coils. Finally, coil selection is further refined according to patient tolerance factors. The following coils are considered for use with a 1.5-T superconducting MR imager; namely, quadrature birdcage head, neurovascular phased-array, and dual single-circular-element coils, as well as investigational coils that have not yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: reduced-volume birdcage end-cap, temporal lobe phased-array, carotid artery phased-array, coils. Rationales are discussed regarding appropriate coil selection for screening whole brain and imaging brainstem, cranial nerves, orbits, cerebral cortex, mesial temporal lobes, and internal auditory canal, and for MR angiography.

Index terms: Brain, MR, 10.12141, 10.12142 • Magnetic resonance (MR), coils • Magnetic resonance (MR), technology • Radiology and radiologists, How I Do It







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.