Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 30, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2213001643
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2213001643v1
221/3/587    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patz, E. F., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, P. C.
(Radiology. 2001;221:587-591.)
© RSNA, 2001


Viewpoint

CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Not Ready for Routine Practice1

Edward F. Patz, Jr, MD, William C. Black, MD and Philip C. Goodman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 (E.F.P., P.C.G.); and the Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (W.C.B.). Received October 12, 2000; revision requested October 24; revision received November 21; accepted December 9. Address correspondence to E.F.P. (e-mail: patz0002@mc.duke.edu).

Lung cancer continues to be a major worldwide health problem. Multiple strategies are being explored in an attempt to reduce lung cancer mortality, including a renewed interest in screening. Multiple low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) trials have been proposed, as proponents predict that small nodules will represent early-stage disease and detecting them will ultimately translate into improvements in outcomes. At this time, however, only prevalence-screening data are available, and it remains to be seen if CT will truly reduce mortality. The appropriate hypothesis-driven studies still must be performed and the results carefully analyzed before CT screening for lung cancer can be accepted as the standard of care.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), utilization • Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12111, 60.12115 • Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.32 • Lung neoplasms, screening • Lung neoplasms, staging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. C. Black, D. R. Aberle, C. D. Berg, and For the Executive Committee of the National Lung S
Large Field Trial for Lung Cancer Screening: Putting the Wrong Cart before the Horse?
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 314 - 316.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. T. Kolber, G. Zipp, D. Glendinning, and J. J. Mitchell
Patient Expectations of Full-Body CT Screening
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W297 - W304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, U. Siebert, and M. T. Beinfeld
Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. W. Grannis
Overestimation of Lung Cancer Mortality in a Computed Tomography-Screened Population
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2439 - 2440.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. Brenner
Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Low-Dose CT Screening of Adult Smokers for Lung Cancer
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 440 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, M. Komi, H. Hayakawa, S. Hori, and Y. Nishimura
Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT: Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Radiologists' Detection Performance
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 347 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ni, S. Dymarkowski, F. Chen, J. Bogaert, G. Marchal, T.-H. Lim, and S. S. Lee
Proper Handling of Research with Invalid Conclusions [letter] * Drs Lim and Lee respond:
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 608 - 610.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
V. R. Grann and A. I. Neugut
Lung Cancer Screening at Any Price?
JAMA, January 15, 2003; 289(3): 357 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. K. Shah, J. H. M. Austin, C. S. White, P. Patel, L. B. Haramati, G. D. N. Pearson, M. C. Shiau, and Y. M. Berkmen
Missed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Radiographic Findings of Potentially Resectable Lesions Evident Only in Retrospect
Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Armato III, F. Li, M. L. Giger, H. MacMahon, S. Sone, and K. Doi
Lung Cancer: Performance of Automated Lung Nodule Detection Applied to Cancers Missed in a CT Screening Program
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, S. G. Armato III, and K. Doi
Lung Cancers Missed at Low-Dose Helical CT Screening in a General Population: Comparison of Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 673 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ni, S. Dymarkowski, F. Chen, J. Bogaert, G. Marchal, S. H. Choi, S. S. Lee, S. I. Choi, S. T. Kim, K. H. Lim, et al.
Occlusive Myocardial Infarction Enhanced or Not Enhanced with Necrosis-avid Contrast Agents at MR Imaging * Dr Choi and colleagues respond:
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 603 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. J. Casarella
A Patient's Viewpoint on a Current Controversy
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 927 - 927.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Hall, E. F. Patz Jr, W. C. Black, and P. C. Goodman
Screening for Lung Cancer: Been There and Done That * Dr Patz and colleagues respond:
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 928 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Anorbe, P. Aisa, E. F. Patz, W. C. Black, and P. C. Goodman
Mortality Rate and Screening * Dr Patz and colleagues respond:
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 929 - 930.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. E. Heffner and G. Silvestri
CT Screening for Lung Cancer . Is Smaller Better?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2002; 165(4): 433 - 434.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. S. Miettinen and C. I. Henschke
Commentary on Drs Patz, Black, and Goodman's Viewpoint
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 598 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.