Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 19, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2221001471
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2221001471v1
222/1/165    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, E.
(Radiology 2002;222:165-170.)
© RSNA, 2001


Breast Imaging

Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Mammographic Appearance as Predictor of Histologic Type1

Mercidyl Gelig Thurfjell, MD, PhD, Anders Lindgren, MD, PhD and Erik Thurfjell, MD, PhD

1 From the Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden (M.G.T., E.T.); and Department of Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden (A.L.). Received August 30, 2000; revision requested October 18; final revision received May 8, 2001; accepted June 5. Address correspondence to E.T. (e-mail: erik.thurfjell@radiol.uu.se).

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between mammographic appearance and histologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammographic characteristics of 317 consecutive clinically nonpalpable breast cancers in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery were reviewed. Malignant lesions were categorized as spiculated masses, other lesions, calcifications, and combined findings. Calcifications were characterized as amorphous, pleomorphic, or fine linear and branching. Logistic regression was used for the evaluation. Odds ratios (ORs) represent the magnitude of the association between a histologic diagnosis and a mammographic finding.

RESULTS: Spiculated mass without calcifications (n = 150) and calcifications alone (n = 79) accounted for three of four cancers. A spiculated mass without calcifications was strongly associated with invasive cancers (OR = 12). Calcifications alone were strongly associated with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (OR = 19). In a decreasing order, the following invasive cancers were each associated with spiculated lesions without calcifications: ductal carcinoma grade 1 (OR = 28), ductal carcinoma grade 2 (OR = 17), lobular carcinoma (OR = 11), and ductal carcinoma grade 3 (OR = 4.6). Fine linear and branching calcifications alone were associated with not only DCIS nuclear grades 3 (OR = 17) and 2 (OR = 9.7) but also with invasive ductal carcinoma grade 3 (OR = 13).

CONCLUSION: Mammographic appearance can be a predictor of histologic diagnosis in three of four nonpalpable breast cancers.

Index terms: Breast neoplasms, calcifications, 00.81, 00.813 • Breast neoplasms, diagnosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
P. D Britton
Breast imaging
BMJ, September 17, 2008; 337(sep17_2): a1313 - a1313.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. S. Burnside, D. L. Rubin, J. P. Fine, R. D. Shachter, G. A. Sisney, and W. K. Leung
Bayesian Network to Predict Breast Cancer Risk of Mammographic Microcalcifications and Reduce Number of Benign Biopsy Results: Initial Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 666 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.