Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 10, 2001, 10.1148/radiol.2222010582
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2222010582v1
222/2/361    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gomella, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gomella, L. G.
(Radiology 2002;222:361-366.)
© RSNA, 2002


Genitourinary Imaging

Contrast-enhanced US of the Prostate with Sonazoid: Comparison with Whole-Mount Prostatectomy Specimens in 12 Patients1

Ethan J. Halpern, MD, Peter A. McCue, MD, Anne K. Aksnes, PhD, Else K. Hagen, MD, Ferdinand Frauscher, MD and Leonard G. Gomella, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (E.J.H., P.A.M., F.F.) and Urology (L.G.G.), Jefferson Prostate Diagnostic Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5244; and Nycomed Amersham, Oslo, Norway (A.K.A., E.K.H.). Received March 8, 2001; revision requested April 11; revision received and accepted June 5. Supported by a grant from Nycomed Amersham. Address correspondence to E.J.H. (e-mail: ethan.halpern@mail.tju.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare areas of contrast material enhancement in the prostate at ultrasonography (US) with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens to determine if the use of contrast material improves the detection rate of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transrectal US was performed in 12 subjects with cancer of the prostate prior to radical prostatectomy. Each gland was evaluated with conventional gray-scale and wide-band harmonic US at baseline and again during intravenous infusion of a microbubble contrast agent. Focal areas of contrast enhancement were identified prospectively in the transverse plane at the base, midgland, and apex of the prostate. US findings were then compared with whole-mount prostatectomy specimens. Baseline and contrast-enhanced findings were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS: Thirty-one foci of prostate cancer were present at pathologic evaluation, with multiple foci of cancer in 11 of the 12 glands. Three of 10 inner-gland cancers and five of 21 outer-gland cancers were detected at baseline imaging. Diffuse inner-gland enhancement was identified in all subjects during contrast agent infusion. Contrast-enhanced imaging demonstrated an additional five cancer foci in the outer gland (P = .025), for an overall sensitivity of 42% (13 of 31 foci). Seven additional sites of focal contrast enhancement were identified. Five of these sites corresponded to foci of hyperplasia. Two sites were false-positive with no pathologic abnormality. Increased flow was not demonstrated posteriorly in the midline, even when a tumor was present.

CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced US of the prostate with Sonazoid can improve sensitivity for the detection of cancers in the outer gland, but it can also demonstrate focal enhancement in areas of benign hyperplasia.

Index terms: Prostate neoplasms, 844.32 • Prostate neoplasms, US, 844.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Tang, J. C. Yang, Y. Li, J. Li, and H. Shi
Peripheral Zone Hypoechoic Lesions of the Prostate: Evaluation With Contrast-Enhanced Gray Scale Transrectal Ultrasonography
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2007; 26(12): 1671 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. P. Ives, L. G. Gomella, and E. J. Halpern
Effect of Dutasteride Therapy on Doppler US Evaluation of Prostate: Preliminary Results
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 197 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
F. Forsberg, W. T. Shi, C. R. B. Merritt, Q. Dai, M. Solcova, and B. B. Goldberg
On the Usefulness of the Mechanical Index Displayed on Clinical Ultrasound Scanners for Predicting Contrast Microbubble Destruction
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Tang, X. Li, N. Wang, S. Zhang, Q. Lin, J. Li, and H. Shi
Correlation Between Hypoechoic Nodules on Ultrasonography and Benign Hyperplasia in the Prostatic Outer Gland
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 483 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
P. H. Arger, S. B. Malkowicz, K. N. VanArsdalen, C. M. Sehgal, A. Holzer, and S. M. Schultz
Color and Power Doppler Sonography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Comparison Between Vascular Density and Total Vascularity
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. T. Yang, G. M. K. Tse, P. K. W. Lam, C. Metreweli, and J. Chang
Correlation Between Color Power Doppler Sonographic Measurement of Breast Tumor Vasculature and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Microvessel Density for the Quantitation of Angiogenesis
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2002; 21(11): 1227 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
F. Forsberg, D. K. Johnson, D. A. Merton, J.-B. Liu, P. E. Losco, E. K. Hagen, and B. B. Goldberg
Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasonography of a Novel Canine Prostate Cancer Model
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2002; 21(9): 1003 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.