Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 25, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2223010811
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2223010811v1
222/3/652    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Pressman, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Low, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Pressman, J. H.
(Radiology 2002;222:652-660.)
© RSNA, 2002


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Crohn Disease with Endoscopic Correlation: Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo and Gadolinium-enhanced Fat-suppressed Spoiled Gradient-Echo MR Imaging1

Russell N. Low, MD, Christopher P. Sebrechts, MD, Douglas A. Politoske, MD, Michael T. Bennett, MD, Sergio Flores, MD, Richard J. Snyder, MD and Jeffrey H. Pressman, MD

1 From the Sharp and Children’s MRI Center (R.N.L., C.P.S.), and Departments of Radiology (R.N.L., C.P.S.) and Gastroenterology (D.A.P., M.T.B., S.F., R.J.S., J.H.P.), Sharp Memorial Hospital, 7901 Frost St, San Diego, CA 92123. Received April 19, 2001; revision requested June 5; revision received July 31; accepted September 17. Address correspondence to R.N.L. (e-mail: rlow@ucsd.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare T2-weighted breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo (SE) and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo (GRE) MR imaging with contrast material administered orally and rectally for evaluating patients with Crohn disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with Crohn disease received 2% barium sulfate and water enema. The abdomen and pelvis were imaged with transverse and coronal single-shot fast SE and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR imaging. Two radiologists reviewed the two types of images for bowel disease. The extent, severity, and conspicuity of the disease were determined. Proof of bowel disease at MR imaging was compared with that at endoscopy, barium study, and surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with the McNemar test.

RESULTS: Twenty-five of 28 patients had proven abnormal bowel segments. The per-patient sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR imaging for the two radiologists was 100% and 96% versus 60% and 60% (P < .05) with single-shot fast SE MR imaging. Gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR images depicted more segments (54 and 52 of 61 segments; sensitivity, 89% and 85%, respectively) of the diseased bowel than did single-shot fast SE MR images (31 and 32 of 61 segments; sensitivity, 51% and 52%, respectively; P < .001). Severity of Crohn disease was correctly depicted at gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE imaging in 93% of patients versus in 43% of patients at single-shot fast SE imaging.

CONCLUSION: In patients with Crohn disease, gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled GRE MR imaging better depicted the extent and severity of intestinal disease compared with single-shot fast SE imaging.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Crohn disease, 70.262 • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 70.121411, 70.121412, 70.121415, 70.121416, 70.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. N. Nadgir, J. A. Soto, K. Dendrinos, B. C. Lucey, J. M. Becker, and F. A. Farraye
MRI of Complicated Pouchitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W386 - W391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. Bodily, J. G. Fletcher, C. A. Solem, C. D. Johnson, J. L. Fidler, J. M. Barlow, M. R. Bruesewitz, C. H. McCollough, W. J. Sandborn, E. V. Loftus Jr, et al.
Crohn Disease: Mural Attenuation and Thickness at Contrast-enhanced CT Enterography--Correlation with Endoscopic and Histologic Findings of Inflammation
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 505 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Maccioni, A. Bruni, A. Viscido, M. C. Colaiacomo, A. Cocco, C. Montesani, R. Caprilli, and M. Marini
MR Imaging in Patients with Crohn Disease: Value of T2- versus T1-weighted Gadolinium-enhanced MR Sequences with Use of an Oral Superparamagnetic Contrast Agent
Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2381040244.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. A. J. Sempere, V. Martinez Sanjuan, E. Medina Chulia, A. Benages, A. Tome Toyosato, P. Canelles, A. Bulto, F. Quiles, I. Puchades, J. Cuquerella, et al.
MRI Evaluation of Inflammatory Activity in Crohn's Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1829 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. K. Hara, J. A. Leighton, V. K. Sharma, R. I. Heigh, and D. E. Fleischer
Imaging of Small Bowel Disease: Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy, Standard Endoscopy, Barium Examination, and CT
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 697 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. R. Birchard, M. A. Brown, W. B. Hyslop, Z. Firat, and R. C. Semelka
MRI of Acute Abdominal and Pelvic Pain in Pregnant Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Furukawa, T. Saotome, M. Yamasaki, K. Maeda, N. Nitta, M. Takahashi, T. Tsujikawa, Y. Fujiyama, K. Murata, and T. Sakamoto
Cross-sectional Imaging in Crohn Disease
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 689 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.