Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231010344
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsukuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Doi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsukuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Doi, K.
(Radiology 2002;223:199-203.)
© RSNA, 2002


Computer Applications

Detection of Lung Nodules on Digital Chest Radiographs: Potential Usefulness of a New Contralateral Subtraction Technique1   

Shunji Tsukuda, MD, Atsuko Heshiki, MD, Shigehiko Katsuragawa, PhD, Qiang Li, PhD, Heber MacMahon, MD and Kunio Doi, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Saitama Medical School, Saitama, Japan (S.T., A.H.); and Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5481 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637. From the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 6, 2001; revision requested March 1; revision received August 20; accepted September 20. Supported by U.S. Public Health Service grants CA62625 and CA64370. Address correspondence to K.D. (e-mail: k-doi@uchicago.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential usefulness of a contralateral subtraction technique developed for radiologists’ performance in the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty chest radiographs (25 normal and 25 abnormal with a subtle lung nodule) that were digitized with a 0.175-mm pixel size and 4,096 gray levels were used. Twelve radiologists (10 attending and two residents) participated in observer tests and read both original and contralateral subtraction images with a sequential testing method. Radiologists’ performance was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis with use of a continuous rating scale. The beneficial and detrimental effects of the contralateral subtraction technique on the radiologists’ performance were also evaluated.

RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values obtained without and with contralateral subtraction images were 0.926 and 0.962, respectively. Results indicated that the contralateral subtraction images significantly (P < .05) improved diagnostic accuracy, particularly for radiologists with limited experience.

CONCLUSION: The contralateral subtraction technique can assist radiologists in the correct identification of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Computers, diagnostic aid • Diagnostic radiology, observer performance • Lung, nodule, 68.332 • Lung neoplasms, diagnosis, 60.30




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Li, R. Engelmann, K. Doi, and H. MacMahon
Improved Detection of Small Lung Cancers with Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 886 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Li, R. Engelmann, C. E. Metz, K. Doi, and H. MacMahon
Lung Cancers Missed on Chest Radiographs: Results Obtained with a Commercial Computer-aided Detection Program
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. B. Lobrano
Partnerships in Oncology and Radiology: The Role of Radiology in the Detection, Staging, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer
Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 774 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.