|
|
||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.P.M.v.H., J.A.V., T.T.C.O., J.C.v.d.B.), Clinical Neurophysiology (E.S.L., R.G.A.A.), Cardiology (S.M.P.G.E.), Neurology (H.W.M.), and Vascular Surgery (F.L.M.), St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, Postbus 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein (Utrecht), the Netherlands. Received July 31, 2001; revision requested September 24; revision received November 21; accepted January 8, 2002. Address correspondence to H.P.M.v.H. (e-mail: j.heesewijk@antonius.net).
PURPOSE: To assess, with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the number and size of new brain lesions after carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) and to evaluate the association of these new lesions with neurologic deficits and transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic (US) data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive CAS procedures were performed in 72 patients. Patients underwent neurologic examination before, during, immediately after, and 1 day, 3 months, and 1 year after CAS. MR imaging was used before and after CAS to assess the number of symptomatic and silent new infarctions. Two radiologists reviewed all pre- and postintervention MR images. The radiologists were blinded to the clinical data.
RESULTS: Postprocedural MR images showed new lesions on the side of stent placement in 11 patients. In six patients, the new lesions were clinically silent. Two patients had a major stroke, one had a minor stroke, and two had transient ischemic attack. In patients who had had transient ischemic attack or stroke before CAS, the frequency of new lesions at postprocedural MR imaging was higher (23%) than in asymptomatic patients (12%); this difference was not statistically significant (P = .29). There was no statistically significant correlation between embolic load as detected with transcranial Doppler US monitoring and the occurrence of either clinical symptoms or new lesions seen at MR imaging.
CONCLUSION: CAS is associated with embolic events. The majority of new lesions seen on postintervention MR images are not detected at neurologic examination.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Carotid arteries, MR, 1722.121411, 178.121411 Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 1722.721, 178.721 Carotid arteries, transluminal angioplasty, 1722.1269, 178.1269 Carotid arteries, US, 1722.12989, 178.12989
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Skjelland, K. Krohg-Sorensen, B. Tennoe, S. J. Bakke, R. Brucher, and D. Russell Cerebral Microemboli and Brain Injury During Carotid Artery Endarterectomy and Stenting Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 230 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schnaudigel, K. Groschel, S. M. Pilgram, and A. Kastrup New Brain Lesions After Carotid Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1911 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pinero, A. Gonzalez, A. Mayol, E. Martinez, J.R. Gonzalez-Marcos, F. Boza, A. Cayuela, and A. Gil-Peralta Silent Ischemia after Neuroprotected Percutaneous Carotid Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1338 - 1345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rosenkranz, J. Fiehler, W. Niesen, C. Waiblinger, B. Eckert, O. Wittkugel, T. Kucinski, J. Rother, H. Zeumer, C. Weiller, et al. The Amount of Solid Cerebral Microemboli during Carotid Stenting Does Not Relate to the Frequency of Silent Ischemic Lesions AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 157 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Orlandi, S. Fanucchi, S. Gallerini, C. Sonnoli, M. Cosottini, M. Puglioli, F. Sartucci, and L. Murri Impaired Clearance of Microemboli and Cerebrovascular Symptoms During Carotid Stenting Procedures Arch Neurol, August 1, 2005; 62(8): 1208 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Lownie, D. M. Pelz, D. H. Lee, S. Men, I. Gulka, and P. Kalapos Efficacy of Treatment of Severe Carotid Bifurcation Stenosis By Using Self-Expanding Stents without Deliberate Use of Angioplasty Balloons AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Sztriha, E. Voros, K. Sas, R. Szentgyorgyi, A. Pocsik, P. Barzo, P. Szikra, A. Makai, A. Szolics, P. Elek, et al. Favorable Early Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Protection Devices Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2862 - 2866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bettmann, M. D. Dake, L. N. Hopkins, B. T. Katzen, C. J. White, A. C. Eisenhauer, W. H. Pearce, K. A. Rosenfield, R. W. Smalling, T. A. Sos, et al. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Conference: Writing Group VI: Revascularization Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2643 - 2650. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Yadav Protecting the brain:how do we measure success? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1014 - 1016. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |