Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 28, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2242011252
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2242011252v1
224/2/463    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, M.
(Radiology 2002;224:463-469.)
© RSNA, 2002


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Bone Marrow Abnormalities of Foot and Ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted Contrast-enhanced Fat-suppressed Spin-Echo MR Imaging1

Marius R. Schmid, MD, Juerg Hodler, Patrick Vienne, Christoph A. Binkert and Marco Zanetti

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.R.S., J.H., C.A.B., M.Z.) and Orthopedic Surgery (P.V.), Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 23, 2001; revision requested September 12; revision received November 15; accepted January 9, 2002. Address correspondence to M.R.S. (e-mail: mariusschmid@hotmail.com).

PURPOSE: To compare short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted contrast material–enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) sequences for depiction of bone marrow abnormalities of the foot and ankle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients with bone marrow abnormalities depicted on turbo STIR images were examined with additional T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine) MR imaging with fat suppression. Volume and signal difference–to-noise ratio (SDNR) were measured. An additional qualitative analysis was performed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists to correlate the presence or absence of ill-defined edema-like zones, well-defined zones, and cystlike zones. Diagnoses determined with MR findings with each sequence were compared with the results of a review panel. Correlation coefficients (r2) and paired t tests were calculated for all measurements. Agreement percentages and {kappa} values were calculated for inter- and intraobserver reproducibility.

RESULTS: Regarding volume of bone marrow abnormalities, a high correlation (r2 = 0.98) of both sequences was found. SDNR was substantially higher on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images than on STIR images (mean, 125.9 vs 95.4; P < .001). The qualitative analysis demonstrated identical imaging patterns with both sequences in 96% (79 of 82, {kappa} = 0.38) of ill-defined zones, in 88% (72 of 82, {kappa} = 0.76) of well-defined zones, and in 98% (80 of 82, {kappa} = 0.84) of cystlike zones. Interobserver reproducibility of the three imaging patterns was similar for both sequences. The {kappa} values for these three zones with STIR sequence were 0.55, 0.68, and 0.69, and those for the T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR sequence were 0.49, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively. Diagnoses determined with MR findings were equal with both sequences in 94% (80 of 85) of involved bones.

CONCLUSION: STIR images and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed MR images demonstrate almost identical imaging patterns, and diagnoses determined with these findings show little difference.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Ankle, abnormalities, 46.219, 46.833 • Ankle, MR, 46.121413, 46.121415, 46.12143 • Bone marrow, abnormalities, 46.219, 46.833 • Foot, abnormalities, 46.219, 46.833 • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement, 46.121415, 46.12143 • Magnetic resonance (MR), inversion recovery, 46.121413




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Schoellnast, H. A. Deutschmann, J. Hermann, G. J. Schaffler, P. Reittner, F. Kammerhuber, D. H. Szolar, and K. W. Preidler
Psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: findings in contrast-enhanced MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. L. Fleming II, L. Dodd, and C. A. Helms
Prominent Vascular Remnants in the Calcaneus Simulating a Lesion on MRI of the Ankle: Findings in 67 Patients with Cadaveric Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1449 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Collins, M. M. Schaar, D. E. Wenger, and J. N. Mandrekar
T1-Weighted MRI Characteristics of Pedal Osteomyelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 386 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Mayerhoefer, M. Breitenseher, S. Hofmann, N. Aigner, R. Meizer, H. Siedentop, and J. Kramer
Computer-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee: Initial Experience with a New Method
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1399 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. L. Bloem, T. J. Mosher, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, H. P. Ledermann, W. B. Morrison, and M. E. Schweitzer
Dynamic Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging in Bone Marrow Disorders [letter] * Dr Mosher responds: * Drs Schmid and Zanetti respond: * Dr Ledermann and colleagues respond:
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 303 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. J. Mosher
Diagnostic Effectiveness of Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging in Evaluation of Abnormal Bone Marrow Signal
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 320 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.