Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 19, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2243010909
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2243010909v1
224/3/713    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
(Radiology 2002;224:713-717.)
© RSNA, 2002


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Enteral Nutrition Provision—Endoscopic or Radiologic Gastrostomy?1

Frank J. Thornton, MD, Timothy Fotheringham, MD, Michael Alexander, MD, Orla Hardiman, MD, Frank P. McGrath, MD and Michael J. Lee, MD

1 From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (F.J.T., T.F., F.P.M., M.J.L.) and Neurology (M.A., O.H.), Beaumont Hospital, PO Box 1297, Beaumont Rd, Dublin 9, Ireland. Received May 11, 2001; revision requested July 9; final revision received February 14, 2002; accepted March 1. Address correspondence to M.J.L. (e-mail: leebeau@iol.ie).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate gastrostomy placement in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to determine the insertion method of choice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 31/2 years, 36 patients with ALS (19 men, 17 women; mean age, 54 years; age range, 37–69 years) underwent gastrostomy. Twenty patients were primarily referred for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and 16 for percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG). Gastrostomy method, success rate of each technique, and reason for procedure failure were reviewed in each patient. Forced vital capacity (FVC) prior to gastrostomy was recorded. PEG was performed with a pull-through technique after transillumination of the abdominal wall. PRG was performed with fluoroscopic guidance and T-fastener gastropexy. A log-rank test was used to compare survival rates after PRG and PEG, and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate the influence of declining FVC on PEG success. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate survival probabilities.

RESULTS: Of the 20 patients referred for PEG, 11 had successful results. The nine failures (45%) resulted from failure to transilluminate the abdominal wall. All 16 patients primarily referred for PRG underwent successful gastrostomy. The nine patients in whom PEG failed underwent subsequent successful PRG. In patients with diaphragmatic palsy and a high subcostal stomach, an angled subcostal approach (n = 6) or intercostal approach (n = 2) was required at PRG. One death occurred in the PEG group (9%) because of procedure-related aspiration, and a second patient from the PEG group required laparotomy for postprocedural peritonitis. One death occurred in the PRG group (4%) because of inadvertent placement of the feeding tube in the peritoneal cavity. There was no significant difference between PEG and PRG in patient survival. FVC did not have a statistically significant influence on PEG failure.

CONCLUSION: Results show PRG to be the method of choice.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 72.613 • Gastrostomy, 72.1267 • Stomach, interventional procedures, 72.1267 • Stomach, surgery, 72.1267




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
C. J McDermott and P. J Shaw
Diagnosis and management of motor neurone disease
BMJ, March 22, 2008; 336(7645): 658 - 662.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. S. Shaw, M. A. Ampong, A. Rio, J. McClure, P. N. Leigh, and P. S. Sidhu
Entristar Skin-Level Gastrostomy Tube: Primary Placement with Radiologic Guidance in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 392 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Chio, R Galletti, C Finocchiaro, D Righi, M A Ruffino, A Calvo, N Di Vito, P Ghiglione, A A Terreni, and R Mutani
Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy: a safe and effective method of nutritional tube placement in advanced ALS
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2004; 75(4): 645 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P N Leigh, S Abrahams, A Al-Chalabi, M-A Ampong, L H Goldstein, J Johnson, R Lyall, J Moxham, N Mustfa, A Rio, et al.
The management of motor neurone disease
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 74(90004): iv32 - 47.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
B J Traynor, M Alexander, B Corr, E Frost, and O Hardiman
Effect of a multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinic on ALS survival: a population based study, 1996-2000
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2003; 74(9): 1258 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.