|
|
||||||||
How I Do It |
1 From the Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889-5600 (D.L.M., P.T.N., J.D.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (D.L.M., J.D.G.); Medical Oncology Clinical Research Unit, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (D.L.M.); and Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY (S.B.). Received August 20, 2001; revision requested October 11; revision received November 8; accepted December 11. Address correspondence to D.L.M. (e-mail: dm72v@nih.gov).
Skin injury is a deterministic effect of radiation. Once a threshold dose has been exceeded, the severity of the radiation effect at any point on the skin increases with increasing dose. Peak skin dose is defined as the highest dose delivered to any portion of the patients skin. Reducing peak skin dose can reduce the likelihood and type of skin injury. Unfortunately, peak skin dose is difficult to measure in real time, and most currently available fluoroscopic systems do not provide the operator with sufficient information to minimize skin dose. Measures that reduce total radiation dose will reduce peak skin dose, as well as dose to the operator and assistants. These measures include minimizing fluoroscopy time, the number of images obtained, and dose by controlling technical factors. Specific techniquesdose spreading and collimationreduce both peak skin dose and the size of skin area subjected to peak skin dose. For optimum effect, real-time knowledge of skin-dose distribution is invaluable. A trained operator using well-maintained state-of-the art equipment can minimize peak skin dose in all fluoroscopically guided procedures.
Index terms: Fluoroscopy, technology Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel Radiations, injurious effects Radiations, measurement Radiology and radiologists, How I Do It
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mesbahi and N. Aslanabadi A STUDY ON PATIENTS' RADIATION DOSES FROM INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURES IN TABRIZ, IRAN Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 23, 2008; (2008) ncn310v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bor, T. Sancak, T. Toklu, T. Olgar, and S. Ener Effects of radiologists' skill and experience on patient doses in interventional examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 1, 2008; 129(1-3): 32 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, H. Kohtake, T. Takeshita, M. Suzuki, K. Kozuma, Y. Yamamoto, and T. Isshiki Radiosensitive Functional Dye: Clinical Application for Estimation of Patient Skin Dose Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 541 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Chida, H. Saito, H. Otani, M. Kohzuki, S. Takahashi, S. Yamada, K. Shirato, and M. Zuguchi Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 774 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
REFERENCES J. ICRU, December 1, 2005; 5(2): 103 - 113. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Seibert Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Do Fluoroscopy Operators Know about Radiation Dose, and Should They Want to Know? Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 633 - 634. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Perisinakis, J. Damilakis, N. Theocharopoulos, G. Papadokostakis, A. Hadjipavlou, and N. Gourtsoyiannis Patient Exposure and Associated Radiation Risks from Fluoroscopically Guided Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 701 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Wagner You Do Not Know What You Are Doing Unless You Know What You Are Doing Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 327 - 328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |