|
|
||||||||
Contrast Media |
1 From the Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Allergy Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Via G. Moscati 31, 00168 Rome, Italy (A.R., M.C.A., M.V.); Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Oasi Maria S.S., Troina, Italy (A.R., M.A., R.P.); and Department of Radiology, UCSC, Rome, Italy (A.V.S.). Received October 10, 2001; revision requested December 20; revision received March 1, 2002; accepted March 14. Address correspondence to A.R. (e-mail: columbus.allerg@linet.it).
A patient with maculopapular reactions to iopamidol needed to undergo angiography for a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. In vivo and in vitro tests were performed with ionic and nonionic contrast media, including iopamidol and iobitridol. All results were positive, demonstrating delayed hypersensitivity. The patient received 6-
-methylprednisolone and cyclosporine 1 week before and 2 weeks after four angiograms were obtained with the use of iobitridol, which was well tolerated.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Angiography, contrast media Contrast media, comparative studies Contrast media, complications
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Bettmann Frequently Asked Questions: Iodinated Contrast Agents RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S3 - S10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |