Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print August 26, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2251011654
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2251011654v1
225/2/466    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vecchioli-Scaldazza, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vecchioli-Scaldazza, A.
(Radiology 2002;225:466-470.)
© RSNA, 2002


Contrast Media

Effective Prophylactic Protocol in Delayed Hypersensitivity to Contrast Media: Report of a Case Involving Lymphocyte Transformation Studies with Different Compounds1

Antonino Romano, MD, Maria Cristina Artesani, MD, Maria Andriolo, PhD, Marinella Viola, MD, Rosa Pettinato, MD and Amorino Vecchioli-Scaldazza, MD

1 From the Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Allergy Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Via G. Moscati 31, 00168 Rome, Italy (A.R., M.C.A., M.V.); Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Oasi Maria S.S., Troina, Italy (A.R., M.A., R.P.); and Department of Radiology, UCSC, Rome, Italy (A.V.S.). Received October 10, 2001; revision requested December 20; revision received March 1, 2002; accepted March 14. Address correspondence to A.R. (e-mail: columbus.allerg@linet.it).

A patient with maculopapular reactions to iopamidol needed to undergo angiography for a cerebral arteriovenous malformation. In vivo and in vitro tests were performed with ionic and nonionic contrast media, including iopamidol and iobitridol. All results were positive, demonstrating delayed hypersensitivity. The patient received 6-{alpha}-methylprednisolone and cyclosporine 1 week before and 2 weeks after four angiograms were obtained with the use of iobitridol, which was well tolerated.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Angiography, contrast media • Contrast media, comparative studies • Contrast media, complications




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Bettmann
Frequently Asked Questions: Iodinated Contrast Agents
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S3 - S10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.