HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2252011731v1 225/2/500    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wagner, S. C. Articles by Nothnagel, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wagner, S. C. Articles by Nothnagel, H.

Picture Archiving and Communication System: Effect on Reporting of Incidental Findings¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 3390 Gibbon Bldg, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received October 23, 2001; revision requested January 14, 2002; final revision received April 29; accepted May 8. Address correspondence to S.C.W.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on reporting of incidental findings outside the area of interest, with a focus on lumbar spinal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of 2,500 lumbar spinal 1.5-T MR examinations were reviewed. These included 500 consecutive lumbar spinal MR reports for each of 5 years: 1 year prior to PACS introduction, 1 year during transition to PACS, and 3 consecutive years thereafter. Incidental findings cited in the reports were tabulated, and the frequency, organ system involved, and radiologist recommendations in each case were noted and compared, as were projected expenses based on the Medicare payment scale for recommended follow-up studies. Results of available follow-up studies were also reviewed.

RESULTS: The number of incidental findings increased from 19 before PACS to 31 during transition and 53, 49, and 50 after PACS implementation, which resulted in a maximum increase of 179%. The increase was statistically significant during each post-PACS year. The most common incidental findings involved potential renal, pelvic, hepatic, pulmonary, and lymph node abnormalities. The total number of recommended follow-up studies increased from five before PACS to 15 during transition and 32, 22, and 18 after PACS implementation, with a maximum increase of as much as 540%. Recommended ultrasonographic studies increased the most from two in the pre-PACS year to 11 during transition and 27, 17, and 14 in the 3 post-PACS years. Follow-up expense increased by a mean of 146% after PACS implementation from $4,221 per 1,000 studies in the pre-PACS year to $9,307, $13,426, $10,558, and $8,252 thereafter. Of the 202 incidental findings, four represented occult malignancy, which is an expense of $5,721 per diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: The introduction of PACS into radiology practice for lumbar spinal MR imaging appears to be associated with an increased number of reported incidental findings and recommended follow-up studies.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Economics, medical • Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) • Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Shaw, C. Senior, E. Peel, R. Cooke, and L. S. Donnelly Ethical Issues in Neuroimaging Health Research: An IPA Study with Research Participants J Health Psychol, November 1, 2008; 13(8): 1051 - 1059. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Furukawa, M. Endo, T. Aramaki, N. Morimoto, T. Uematsu, S. Yukizawa, and S. Yuen Picture Archiving and Communication System Introduced to a New Japanese Cancer Center Hospital Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 34(7): 425 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]