|
|
||||||||
Thoracic Imaging |
1 From the Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 (S.G.A., F.L., M.L.G., H.M., K.D.); and Department of Radiology, Azumi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan (S.S.). From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received August 13, 2001; revision requested October 10; revision received March 8, 2002; accepted May 7. Supported in part by United States Public Health Service grants CA83908, CA64370, and CA62525, funding from the University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, and a grant from the Grant Healthcare Foundation through the Medical Imaging and Research Foundation of the University of Chicago. Address correspondence to S.G.A. (e-mail: s-armato@uchicago.edu).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a fully automated computerized method for the detection of lung nodules in computed tomographic (CT) scans in the identification of lung cancers that may be missed during visual interpretation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database of 38 low-dose CT scans with 50 lung nodules was obtained from a lung cancer screening program. Thirty-eight of the nodules represented biopsy-confirmed lung cancers that had not been reported during initial clinical interpretation. A computer detection method that involved the use of gray-level thresholding techniques to identify three-dimensionally contiguous structures within the lungs was applied to the CT data. Computer-extracted volume was used to determine whether a structure became a nodule candidate. A rule-based scheme and a cascaded automated classifier were applied to the set of nodule candidates to distinguish actual nodules from areas of normal anatomy. Overall performance of the computer detection method was evaluated with free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis.
RESULTS: At a specific operating point on the FROC curve, the method achieved a sensitivity of 80% (40 of 50 nodules), with an average of 1.0 false-positive detection per section. Missed cancers were detected by the computerized method with a sensitivity of 84% (32 of 38 nodules) and a false-positive rate of 1.0 per section.
CONCLUSION: With an automated lung nodule detection method, a large fraction (84%, 32 of 38) of missed cancers in a database of low-dose CT scans were detected correctly.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Cancer screening Computed tomography (CT), image processing Computers, diagnostic aid Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12115, 60.30
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Girvin and J. P. Ko Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Assessment, and CAD Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1057 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beigelman-Aubry, P. Raffy, W. Yang, R. A. Castellino, and P. A. Grenier Computer-Aided Detection of Solid Lung Nodules on Follow-Up MDCT Screening: Evaluation of Detection, Tracking, and Reading Time Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 948 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peloschek, J. Sailer, M. Weber, C. J. Herold, M. Prokop, and C. Schaefer-Prokop Pulmonary Nodules: Sensitivity of Maximum Intensity Projection versus That of Volume Rendering of 3D Multidetector CT Data Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 561 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Jeong, C. A. Yi, and K. S. Lee Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Characterization, and Guidance for Further Diagnostic Workup and Treatment Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 57 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Das, G. Muhlenbruch, A. H. Mahnken, T. G. Flohr, L. Gundel, S. Stanzel, T. Kraus, R. W. Gunther, and J. E. Wildberger Small Pulmonary Nodules: Effect of Two Computer-aided Detection Systems on Radiologist Performance. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 564 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Jaffe Measures of Response: RECIST, WHO, and New Alternatives J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3245 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yuan, P. M. Vos, and P. L. Cooperberg Computer-Aided Detection in Screening CT for Pulmonary Nodules. Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1280 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, K. Kawanaka, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita Pulmonary Nodules: Estimation of Malignancy at Thin-Section Helical CT--Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Performance of Radiologists Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 276 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gur Lung Cancer Screening: Radiology's Opportunity Here and Now Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 395 - 397. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, H. Arimura, K. Suzuki, J. Shiraishi, Q. Li, H. Abe, R. Engelmann, S. Sone, H. MacMahon, and K. Doi Computer-aided Detection of Peripheral Lung Cancers Missed at CT: ROC Analyses without and with Localization Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 684 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Kim, J. M. Goo, J. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, B. G. Min, K. T. Bae, and J.-G. Im Computer-aided Diagnosis of Localized Ground-Glass Opacity in the Lung at CT: Initial Experience Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 657 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Leader, T. E. Warfel, C. R. Fuhrman, S. K. Golla, J. L. Weissfeld, R. S. Avila, W. D. Turner, and B. Zheng Pulmonary Nodule Detection with Low-Dose CT of the Lung: Agreement Among Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Peldschus, P. Herzog, S. A. Wood, J. I. Cheema, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Second Reader: Spectrum of Findings in CT Studies of the Chest Interpreted as Normal Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1517 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Goo, T. Tongdee, R. Tongdee, K. Yeo, C. F. Hildebolt, and K. T. Bae Volumetric Measurement of Synthetic Lung Nodules with Multi-Detector Row CT: Effect of Various Image Reconstruction Parameters and Segmentation Thresholds on Measurement Accuracy Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 850 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Doi Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2005; 78(suppl_1): S3 - s19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Rubin, J. K. Lyo, D. S. Paik, A. J. Sherbondy, L. C. Chow, A. N. Leung, R. Mindelzun, P. K. Schraedley-Desmond, S. E. Zinck, D. P. Naidich, et al. Pulmonary Nodules on Multi-Detector Row CT Scans: Performance Comparison of Radiologists and Computer-aided Detection Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 274 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Patz Jr, S. J. Swensen, and J. E. Herndon II Estimate of Lung Cancer Mortality From Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography Screening Trials: Implications for Current Mass Screening Recommendations J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2202 - 2206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Bryan The Digital rEvolution: The Millennial Change in Medical Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 299 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Johnson Hard- versus Soft-Copy Interpretation Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 629 - 630. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, S. G. Armato III, and K. Doi Lung Cancers Missed at Low-Dose Helical CT Screening in a General Population: Comparison of Clinical, Histopathologic, and Imaging Findings Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 673 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |