|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology, Lucas MRS Center (R.W.P., L.C.C., C.F.B., M.N.M., R.E.M., R.B., R.B.J.) and Statistics (J.H.), Stanford University, Calif; and Department of Radiology, Veterans Administration Palo Alto Health Care System, Calif (M.N.M.). Received May 4, 2001; revision requested June 22; final revision received May 8, 2002; accepted May 28. R.W.P. supported by a research grant from the Max Kade Foundation. Address correspondence to R.W.P., Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (e-mail: rupert.prokesch@univie.ac.at).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of curved planar reformations compared with standard transverse images in the assessment of pancreatic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients suspected of having pancreatic tumors underwent contrast materialenhanced biphasic multidetector row computed tomography (CT). Curved planar reformations were generated along the pancreatic duct, common bile duct, and major mesenteric vessels. Three blinded independent readers assessed the curved planar reformations and transverse images separately for the presence of tumor, resectability, and vascular involvement. The results were compared with those of a consensus panel who evaluated the curved planar reformations and transverse images together along with clinical data and surgical findings.
RESULTS: Of 43 patients, 20 had pancreatic malignancies as judged by the consensus panel and proven at biopsy and/or clinical follow-up. For tumor detection, transverse images and curved planar reformations had an average sensitivity of 95.0% and 98.4% (P > .05), respectively, and an average specificity of 90.9% and 91.3% (P > .05), respectively. For tumor resectability, transverse images and curved planar reformations had an average sensitivity of 85.7% and 71.4% (P > .05), respectively, and an average specificity of 85.2% and 84.3% (P > .05), respectively. Average interpretation time was 6.4 minutes with transverse images and 4.1 minutes with curved planar reformations.
CONCLUSION: Curved planar reformations are equivalent to transverse images in the detection of pancreatic tumors and determination of surgical resectability.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), multidetector row, 770.12119 Images, analysis Pancreas, CT, 770.12112, 770.12115, 770.12117, 770.12119 Pancreas, neoplasms, 770.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Strobel, S. Heinrich, U. Bhure, J. Soyka, P. Veit-Haibach, B. C. Pestalozzi, P.-A. Clavien, and T. F. Hany Contrast-Enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-Stop-Shop Imaging for Assessing the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1408 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Furukawa, K. Uesaka, and N. Boku Treatment Decision Making in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Multidisciplinary Team Discussion With Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Arch Surg, March 1, 2008; 143(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Zamboni, J. B. Kruskal, C. M. Vollmer, J. Baptista, M. P. Callery, and V. D. Raptopoulos Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Value of Multidetector CT Angiography in Preoperative Evaluation Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 770 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ichikawa, S. M. Erturk, H. Sou, H. Nakajima, T. Tsukamoto, U. Motosugi, and T. Araki MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimal imaging phases and multiplanar reformatted imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1513 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Paulson, J. P. Harris, T. A. Jaffe, P. A. Haugan, and R. C. Nelson Acute Appendicitis: Added Diagnostic Value of Coronal Reformations from Isotropic Voxels at Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 879 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kobayashi, T. Yamaguchi, T. Ishihara, T. Ohshima, I. Ohno, K. Seza, Y. Shirai, K. Sudo, A. Nakagawa, H. Tadenuma, et al. Assessment of Portal Vein Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer by Fusion 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takeshita, K. Kutomi, K. Takada, H. Kohtake, and S. Furui 3D Pancreatic Arteriography with MDCT During Intraarterial Infusion of Contrast Material in the Detection and Localization of Insulinomas Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 852 - 854. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |