Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 24, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2253010997
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2253010997v1
225/3/871    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rabinov, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rabinov, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, R. G.
(Radiology 2002;225:871-879.)
© RSNA, 2002


Neuroradiology

In Vivo 3-T MR Spectroscopy in the Distinction of Recurrent Glioma versus Radiation Effects: Initial Experience1

James D. Rabinov, MD, Patricia Lani Lee, PhD, Frederick G. Barker, MD, David N. Louis, MD, Griffith R. Harsh, IV, MD, G. Rees Cosgrove, MD, E. Antonio Chiocca, MD, Allan F. Thornton, MD, Jay S. Loeffler, MD, John W. Henson, MD and R. Gilberto Gonzalez, MD, PhD

1 From the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center (P.L.L., R.G.G.) and Departments of Radiology (J.D.R., R.G.G.), Pathology (D.N.L.), Neurosurgery (F.G.B., G.R.C., E.A.C.), Radiation Therapy (A.F.T., J.S.L.), and Neurology (J.W.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Gray 2, Boston, MA 02114; and Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Medical Center, Calif (G.R.H.). Received June 4, 2001; revision requested July 12; final revision received May 7, 2002; accepted May 29. Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants 1R21CA80113 and 1R01CA83159. Address correspondence to J.D.R. (e-mail: jrabinov@partners.org).

PURPOSE: To determine if 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy allows accurate distinction of recurrent tumor from radiation effects in patients with gliomas of grade II or higher.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This blinded prospective study included 14 patients who underwent in vivo 3-T MR spectroscopy prior to stereotactic biopsy. All patients received a previous diagnosis of glioma (grade II or higher) and high-dose radiation therapy (>54 Gy). Prior to MR spectroscopy, conventional MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T to identify a gadolinium-enhanced region within the irradiated volume. Diagnosis was assigned by means of histopathologic analysis of the biopsy samples.

RESULTS: Sixteen of 17 biopsy locations could be classified as predominantly tumor or predominantly radiation effect on the basis of the ratio of choline at the biopsy site to normal creatine level by using a value greater than 1.3 as the criterion for tumor. The remaining case, classified as recurrent tumor on the basis of MR spectroscopy results, was diagnosed as predominantly radiation effect on the basis of histopathologic findings. Disease in this patient progressed to biopsy-proven recurrence within 3 months. Overall, the ratio of choline at the biopsy site to normal creatine level was significantly elevated (unpaired two-tailed Student t test, P < .002) in those biopsy samples composed predominantly of tumor (n = 9) compared with those containing predominantly radiation effects (n = 8). The ratio was not significantly different between the two histopathologic groups.

CONCLUSION: In vivo 3-T MR spectroscopy has sufficient spatial resolution and chemical specificity to allow distinction of recurrent tumor from radiation effects in patients with treated gliomas.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Brain, biopsy, 13.1261 • Brain, effects of irradiation on, 13.47 • Brain neoplasms, diagnosis, 13.363 • Brain neoplasms, MR, 13.12145 • Brain neoplasms, MR spectroscopy, 13.12145 • Radiations, injurious effects, 13.47




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Hourani, L.J. Brant, T. Rizk, J.D. Weingart, P.B. Barker, and A. Horska
Can Proton MR Spectroscopic and Perfusion Imaging Differentiate Between Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Brain Lesions in Adults?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 366 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. Goebell, J. Fiehler, X.-Q. Ding, S. Paustenbach, S. Nietz, O. Heese, T. Kucinski, C. Hagel, M. Westphal, and H. Zeumer
Disarrangement of Fiber Tracts and Decline of Neuronal Density Correlate in Glioma Patients--A Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging and 1H-MR Spectroscopy Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. G. Sorensen
Magnetic Resonance As a Cancer Imaging Biomarker
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3274 - 3281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. A. Butowski, P. K. Sneed, and S. M. Chang
Diagnosis and Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Astrocytoma
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2006; 24(8): 1273 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Vazquez, A. Castellote, J. Piqueras, P. Ortuno, J. Sanchez-Toledo, P. Nogues, and J. Lucaya
Second Malignancies in Pediatric Patients: Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1155 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.