|
|
||||||||
Technical Developments |
1 From the Department of Radiology (A.M.H., M.O.P., M.F., H.I.) and Clinic for Radiation Therapy (J.N.), University of Vienna, AKH-Wien, 8F, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Department for Digital Picture Analysis, University of Technology Graz, Austria (R.R.B.); and Lucas MRI Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, Calif (R.B.). Received October 18, 2001; revision requested January 2, 2002; final revision received April 25; accepted April 30. Address correspondence to A.M.H. (e-mail: andreas.herneth@univie.ac.at).
The authors evaluated the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the assessment of vertebral metastases and acute vertebral compression fractures in 22 patients with known or suspected vertebral metastases. On the basis of significantly (P < .03) different ADCs, vertebral metastases (0.69 x 10-3 mm2/sec) and pathologic compression fractures (0.65 x 10-3 mm2/sec) can be safely distinguished from vertebral bodies (1.66 x 10-3 mm2/sec) and benign compression fractures (1.62 x 10-3 mm2/sec). Thus, the use of ADCs may increase the specificity of magnetic resonance imaging in these patients.
© RSNA, 2002
Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study, 30.12144 Magnetic resonance (MR), echo planar, 30.121416, 30.12144 Spine, MR, 30.121416, 30.12144 Spine, secondary neoplasms, 30.33
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T NIWA, M UENO, S OHKAWA, T YOSHIDA, T DOIUCHI, K ITO, and T INOUE Advanced pancreatic cancer: the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient to predict response to chemotherapy Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Oner, L. Aggunlu, S. Akpek, T. Tali, and A. Celik Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Appendicular Skeleton with a Non Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequence Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1494 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.G. Hatipoglu, A. Selvi, D. Ciliz, and E. Yuksel Quantitative and Diffusion MR Imaging as a New Method To Assess Osteoporosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1934 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J. Nemeth, J.W. Henson, M.E. Mullins, R.G. Gonzalez, and P.W. Schaefer Improved Detection of Skull Metastasis with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1088 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Body: Applications and Challenges in Oncology Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1622 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.Y. Oner, T. Tali, F. Celikyay, A. Celik, and P. Le Roux Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine with a Non-Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequence: Initial Experience AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Aganovic, R. S. Hoda, and Z. Rumboldt Hyperintensity of Spinal Cryptococcus Infection on Diffusion-Weighted MR Images Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1176 - 1177. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hamaoka, J. E. Madewell, D. A. Podoloff, G. N. Hortobagyi, and N. T. Ueno Bone Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2942 - 2953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Castillo Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine: Is It Reliable? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1251 - 1253. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jaramillo, S. A. Connolly, S. Vajapeyam, R. L. Robertson, P. S. Dunning, R. V. Mulkern, A. Hayward, S. E. Maier, and F. Shapiro Normal and Ischemic Epiphysis of the Femur: Diffusion MR Imaging— Study in Piglets Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 825 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |