Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 11, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2271011378
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2271011378v1
227/1/80    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haradome, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hachiya, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haradome, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hachiya, J.
(Radiology 2003;227:80-88.)
© RSNA, 2003


Gastrointestinal Imaging

The Pearl Necklace Sign: An Imaging Sign of Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder at MR Cholangiopancreatography1

Hiroki Haradome, MD, Tomoaki Ichikawa, MD, Hironobu Sou, MD, Takeharu Yoshikawa, MD, Akihisa Nakamura, MD, Tutomu Araki, MD and Junichi Hachiya, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181, Japan (H.H., A.N., J.H.); and Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University School of Medicine, Japan (T.I., H.S., T.Y., T.A.). Received August 9, 2001; revision requested October 10; revision received May 9, 2002; accepted July 24. Address correspondence to H.H. (e-mail: haradome@ff.iij4u.or.jp).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the demonstration of the pearl necklace sign at magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with proven adenomyomatosis and carcinoma of the gallbladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRCP findings and those of a combination of unenhanced and arterial phase computed tomography (CT) and arterial phase MR imaging were retrospectively compared in 29 patients who were pathologically proven to have adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and in 18 patients with pathologically proven gallbladder carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used with a five-point confidence scale. The relative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each imaging modality were also calculated. The pearl necklace sign was defined on MRCP images as small round foci, with the same markedly high signal intensity as bile, within the thickened wall of the gallbladder.

RESULTS: The mean area under the ROC curve of MRCP alone and that of the combination of MRCP and arterial phase MR imaging was significantly higher than that of combined CT (unenhanced and arterial phase) and arterial phase MR imaging alone (P < .01). The relative sensitivities in the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder were 24% for the combined CT, 29% for arterial phase MR imaging, 62% for MRCP, and 57% for the combination of MRCP and arterial phase MR imaging. The mean relative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the pearl necklace sign on MRCP images were 62%, 92%, and 74%, respectively. In eight (28%) of 29 patients with adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder, the pearl necklace sign was not identified by all three readers on the MRCP images.

CONCLUSION: The pearl necklace sign, which indicates the presence of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses within the thickened gallbladder wall, was specifically detected at MRCP for adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 762.12111, 762.12112 • Gallbladder, adenomyomatosis, 762.3119 • Gallbladder, neoplasms, 762.31, 762.32 • Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 762.121411, 762.121412, 762.121416, 762.12143




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
Image of the Month--Diagnosis
Arch Surg, November 1, 2008; 143(11): 1130 - 1130.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. K. Han, B. I. Choi, and J. Y. Choi
Analysis of Enhancement Pattern of Flat Gallbladder Wall Thickening on MDCT to Differentiate Gallbladder Cancer from Cholecystitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
O. A. Catalano, D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, M. S. Cushing, P. F. Hahn, J. J. Brown, and R. R. Edelman
MR Imaging of the Gallbladder: A Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 135 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. H. Ching, B. M. Yeh, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley
CT Differentiation of Adenomyomatosis and Gallbladder Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 62 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. R. Boscak, M. Al-Hawary, and S. R. Ramsburgh
Best cases from the AFIP: Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 941 - 946.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.