|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181, Japan (H.H., A.N., J.H.); and Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University School of Medicine, Japan (T.I., H.S., T.Y., T.A.). Received August 9, 2001; revision requested October 10; revision received May 9, 2002; accepted July 24. Address correspondence to H.H. (e-mail: haradome@ff.iij4u.or.jp).
PURPOSE: To evaluate the demonstration of the pearl necklace sign at magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with proven adenomyomatosis and carcinoma of the gallbladder.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRCP findings and those of a combination of unenhanced and arterial phase computed tomography (CT) and arterial phase MR imaging were retrospectively compared in 29 patients who were pathologically proven to have adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and in 18 patients with pathologically proven gallbladder carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used with a five-point confidence scale. The relative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each imaging modality were also calculated. The pearl necklace sign was defined on MRCP images as small round foci, with the same markedly high signal intensity as bile, within the thickened wall of the gallbladder.
RESULTS: The mean area under the ROC curve of MRCP alone and that of the combination of MRCP and arterial phase MR imaging was significantly higher than that of combined CT (unenhanced and arterial phase) and arterial phase MR imaging alone (P < .01). The relative sensitivities in the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder were 24% for the combined CT, 29% for arterial phase MR imaging, 62% for MRCP, and 57% for the combination of MRCP and arterial phase MR imaging. The mean relative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the pearl necklace sign on MRCP images were 62%, 92%, and 74%, respectively. In eight (28%) of 29 patients with adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder, the pearl necklace sign was not identified by all three readers on the MRCP images.
CONCLUSION: The pearl necklace sign, which indicates the presence of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses within the thickened gallbladder wall, was specifically detected at MRCP for adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder.
© RSNA, 2003
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies, 762.12111, 762.12112 Gallbladder, adenomyomatosis, 762.3119 Gallbladder, neoplasms, 762.31, 762.32 Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 762.121411, 762.121412, 762.121416, 762.12143
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Image of the Month--Diagnosis Arch Surg, November 1, 2008; 143(11): 1130 - 1130. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. K. Han, B. I. Choi, and J. Y. Choi Analysis of Enhancement Pattern of Flat Gallbladder Wall Thickening on MDCT to Differentiate Gallbladder Cancer from Cholecystitis Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Catalano, D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, M. S. Cushing, P. F. Hahn, J. J. Brown, and R. R. Edelman MR Imaging of the Gallbladder: A Pictorial Essay RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 135 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Ching, B. M. Yeh, A. C. Westphalen, B. N. Joe, A. Qayyum, and F. V. Coakley CT Differentiation of Adenomyomatosis and Gallbladder Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 62 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Boscak, M. Al-Hawary, and S. R. Ramsburgh Best cases from the AFIP: Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 941 - 946. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |