Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 27, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2273020518
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2273020518v1
227/3/633    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thrall, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thrall, J. H.
(Radiology 2003;227:633-638.)
© RSNA, 2003


Opinion

Biomarkers in Imaging: Realizing Radiology’s Future1

John J. Smith, MD, JD, A. Gregory Sorensen, MD and James H. Thrall, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and MGH Center for Biomarkers in Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman St, WACC 515, Boston, MA 02114. Received May 6, 2002; revision requested July 10; revision received August 13; accepted October 1. Address correspondence to J.J.S. (e-mail: smith.john@mgh.harvard.edu).

Modern pharmaceuticals and medical devices have provided substantial benefits to patients throughout the world. These benefits come at a high and increasing cost, with development of the typical pharmaceutical requiring 12 years and hundreds of millions of dollars before gaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration marketing approval. Appropriate use of imaging biomarkers—defined as anatomic, physiologic, biochemical, or molecular parameters detectable with imaging methods used to establish the presence or severity of disease—offer the prospect of smaller, less expensive, and more efficient preclinical studies and clinical trials. Scientists, government regulators, and industry have all recognized the potential of biomarkers in imaging. Although real, this promise can only be realized with the rigorous application of science to their use. Success is most likely when (a) the presence of an imaging marker is closely linked with the presence of a target disease; (b) detection and/or measurement of the biomarker is accurate, reproducible, and feasible over time; and (c) measured changes are closely linked to success or failure of the therapeutic effect of the product being evaluated. By applying this paradigm to the array of imaging modalities, the radiology community is poised to become a major force in preclinical and clinical evaluations of new medical treatments.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Opinions • Radiology and radiologists, research • Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
T. A. Altes, M. Eichinger, and M. Puderbach
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lung in Cystic Fibrosis
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 321 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
P. A. de Jong and H. A. W. M. Tiddens
Cystic Fibrosis Specific Computed Tomography Scoring
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 338 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
B. W. Ramsey
Use of Lung Imaging Studies as Outcome Measures for Development of New Therapies in Cystic Fibrosis
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 359 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. P. Schuster
The Opportunities and Challenges of Developing Imaging Biomarkers to Study Lung Function and Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2007; 176(3): 224 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. G. Sorensen
Magnetic Resonance As a Cancer Imaging Biomarker
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3274 - 3281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Benner, J. J. Wisco, A. J. W. van der Kouwe, B. Fischl, M. G. Vangel, F. H. Hochberg, and A. G. Sorensen
Comparison of Manual and Automatic Section Positioning of Brain MR Images
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 246 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Brody, H. A. W. M. Tiddens, R. G. Castile, H. O. Coxson, P. A. de Jong, J. Goldin, W. Huda, F. R. Long, M. McNitt-Gray, M. Rock, et al.
Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2005; 172(10): 1246 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Brody, H. Sucharew, J. D. Campbell, S. P. Millard, P. L. Molina, J. S. Klein, and J. Quan
Computed Tomography Correlates with Pulmonary Exacerbations in Children with Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2005; 172(9): 1128 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Thrall
Personalized Medicine
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 613 - 616.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. S. Brody
Scoring Systems for CT in Cystic Fibrosis: Who Cares?
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 296 - 298.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.