HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2273020535v1 227/3/839    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aaronson, O. S. Articles by Tulipan, N. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aaronson, O. S. Articles by Tulipan, N. B.

Myelomeningocele: Prenatal Evaluation—Comparison between Transabdominal US and MR Imaging¹

¹ From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.S.A., N.B.T.), Radiology (M.H.S.), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.P.B.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-2219 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; and Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (G.W.R.). Received May 6, 2002; revision requested June 21; final revision received September 27; accepted October 25. Supported by a grant from the Dana Foundation. Address correspondence to N.B.T. (e-mail: noel.tulipan@vanderbilt.edu).

PURPOSE: To compare transabdominal ultrasonography (US) with fetal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the prenatal evaluation of myelomeningocele lesion level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prenatal US images, pre- and postnatal MR images, and postnatal spinal radiographs obtained in the first 100 fetuses who underwent intrauterine myelomeningocele repair were the basis for this study. Each image was used to assign a lesion level. The assigned levels were compared by means of the statistic, as an index of agreement.

RESULTS: All fetuses underwent prenatal US. Sixty-one fetuses underwent prenatal MR imaging. Fifty fetuses underwent both postnatal spinal radiography and postnatal MR imaging, and an additional 34 fetuses underwent one postnatal study but not the other. When findings on prenatal US images were compared with those on postnatal radiographs, the findings agreed within one spinal level in 79% (55 of 70, = 0.60) of cases. When findings on prenatal MR images were compared with those on postnatal radiographs, the findings agreed in 82% (31 of 38, = 0.63) of cases. Findings on postnatal MR images and those on postnatal spinal radiographs agreed within one spinal level in 100% (50 of 50, = 1.0) of cases.

CONCLUSION: Findings at prenatal MR imaging and prenatal US are equally accurate for the assignment of a lesion level in a fetus with myelomeningocele. Given that findings with both modalities will lead to misdiagnosis of the spinal level by two or more segments in at least 20% of cases, care should be exercised when neurologic outcome is predicted on the basis of these studies alone.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Fetus, central nervous system, 856.8746 • Fetus, MR, 856.121412, 856.121416, 856.8746 • Fetus, surgery, 856.12986, 856.8746 • Fetus, US, 856.12986, 856.8746 • Pregnancy, US, 856.12986, 856.8746 • Spina bifida, 351.1452

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. von Koch, O. A. Glenn, R. B. Goldstein, and A. J. Barkovich Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Detection of Spinal Cord Anomalies in Patients With Sonographically Detected Bony Anomalies of the Spine J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 781 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]