Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2281012035
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bae, K. T.
(Radiology 2003;228:101-106.)
© RSNA, 2003


Cardiac Imaging

Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcium with Multi–Detector row CT: Assessing Interscan Variability with Different Tube Currents—Pilot Study1

Naoki Takahashi, MD2 and Kyongtae T. Bae, MD, PhD

1 From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110. From the 2001 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received December 13, 2001; revision requested February 18, 2002; final revision received October 30; accepted November 11. Address correspondence to K.T.B. (e-mail: baet@mir.wustl.edu).

PURPOSE: To assess the interscan variability of coronary artery calcium as measured with different tube currents and quantification methods in prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated multi–detector row CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three subjects who were asymptomatic for coronary heart disease underwent prospective ECG-gated, subsecond multi–detector row CT of the heart. Each subject underwent two consecutive CT examinations, the first with a dose of either 40 mAs (n = 18) or 80 mAs (n = 15) and the second with a dose of 150 mAs. Calcium volume and calcium score were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the calcium scores of high- and low-dose examinations. Interscan variability in these measurements (ie, the absolute percentage difference) was compared between the examinations with 40–150 mAs and those with 80–150 mAs by using an independent sample t test. In addition, the interscan variabilities of calcium scores between vessels were evaluated with repeated measures of analysis of variance. The interscan variabilities between calcium score and volume measurement were also compared with paired t tests.

RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 33 subjects had coronary artery calcium deposits on both CT scans. Five subjects had no calcium deposit on either scan. One subject had calcium deposits on only one scan. The total calcium score between the high- and low-dose scans was highly correlated (r = 0.98) and was not significantly different (P = .58). The interscan variability of calcium score showed no significant difference with respect to subject (P = .25) or vessel (P = .84). The interscan variability of the calcium volume measurement was significantly lower than that of the calcium score with respect to both the subject (P < .01) and the vessel (P < .01).

CONCLUSION: A dose of 40 mAs appears adequate for quantifying coronary artery calcium at multi–detector row CT. Interscan variability of multi–detector row CT is substantially reduced by using the calcium volume method.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row • Coronary vessels, calcification, 54.76 • Coronary vessels, CT, 949.1291, 54.12119




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. M. Kim, M. J. Chung, K. S. Lee, Y. H. Choe, C. A. Yi, and B.-K. Choe
Coronary Calcium Screening Using Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening: Effectiveness of MDCT with Retrospective Reconstruction
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 917 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, N. Hirai, Y. Akiyama, C. Fujioka, K. Marukawa, H. Fukuda, and K. Ito
Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W1 - W6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Shemesh, R. Evron, N. Koren-Morag, S. Apter, J. Rozenman, D. Shaham, Y. Itzchak, and M. Motro
Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement with Multi-Detector Row CT and Low Radiation Dose: Comparison between 55 and 165 mAs
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 810 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, T. K. Pilgram, F. Zhu, and K. T. Bae
Coronary Artery Calcification: Effect of Size of Field of View on Multi-Detector Row CT Measurements
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 281 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.