HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2283021162v1 228/3/609    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pezzullo, J. C. Articles by Lewicki, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pezzullo, J. C. Articles by Lewicki, A. M.

Schatzki Ring, Statistically Reexamined¹

¹ From the Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Biostatistics (J.C.P.) and Radiology (A.M.L.), Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Received September 9, 2002; revision requested October 28; revision received November 13; accepted January 6, 2003. Address correspondence to J.C.P., 1711 Liggins Ave, Kissimmee, FL 34744-4091 (e-mail: johnp71@aol.com).

In the article by Schatzki published in 1963, data about the lower esophageal ring relate ring diameter to presence of dysphagia. Statistical analysis of these measurements was performed to quantify conclusions of Schatzki and to extract additional information from the data. Ring diameters in 332 patients with and without dysphagia are described in a histogram in the original article of Schatzki. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to quantify the relationship between ring diameter and dysphagia. Follow-up information was available in 36 symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic patients of Schatzki. Logistic regression indicated that there was a highly significant difference in ring diameter between the asymptomatic group and patients with recurrent dysphagia (P < .001) but not in patients who had a single episode of dysphagia at presentation (P = .229). Odds ratio of 0.686 indicated that a 1-mm increase in ring diameter decreased the likelihood of dysphagia by 31%; conversely, a 1-mm decrease in ring diameter increased the likelihood of dysphagia by 46%. ROC curve of sensitivity and specificity of ring diameter and symptoms showed that the 20-mm cutoff of Schatzki had a 96% (104 of 108) sensitivity and a 58% (130 of 224) specificity, with area under the ROC curve of 0.888. Retrospective statistical analysis of original data of Schatzki validated his major conclusions about the data. Some important questions remain unanswered because of missing data in the study of Schatzki.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Deglutition disorders, 71.74 • Esophagus, diseases, 71.74 • Esophagus, function, 71.74 • Esophagus, stenosis or obstruction, 71.74 • Statistical analysis