Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 24, 2003, 10.1148/radiol.2283020095
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2283020095v1
228/3/857    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geraghty, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boone, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geraghty, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boone, J. M.
(Radiology 2003;228:857-863.)
© RSNA, 2003


Technical Developments

Determination of Height, Weight, Body Mass Index, and Body Surface Area with a Single Abdominal CT Image1

Estella M. Geraghty, MD, MS and John M. Boone, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4701 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817-2205. Received February 21, 2002; revision requested April 18; final revision received October 29; accepted November 5. Address correspondence to J.M.B. (e-mail: jmboone@ucdavis.edu).

Techniques for estimation of an individual’s height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA) with a single abdominal computed tomographic (CT) image were developed. Eighty-seven abdominal CT examinations performed in adult humans were analyzed. Anatomic structures were outlined on the CT section that included L1. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to derive sex-specific predictive equations. Correlation for height was good (r > 0.65). Relationship between predicted weight and actual weight was good (r > 0.93). For BMI and BSA, r was greater than 0.893 and greater than 0.895, respectively. In this study, predictive equations for height, weight, BMI, and BSA were generated.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Abdomen, CT, 70.1211 • Computed tomography (CT), utilization, 70.1211




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Hilson, E. M. Geraghty, and J. M. Boone
Bland-Altman Plot [letter] * Drs Geraghty and Boone respond:
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 604 - 605.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.