HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Willmann, J. K. Articles by Weishaupt, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Willmann, J. K. Articles by Weishaupt, D.

Evaluation of Peripheral Arterial Bypass Grafts with Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Duplex US and Digital Subtraction Angiography¹

¹ From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (J.K.W., L.M.D., B.M., D.W.), Division of Cardiovascular Surgery (D.M.), and Division of Angiology (M.B.), University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; University Institute of Applied Radiophysics, Lausanne, Switzerland (F.R.V.); and Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Switzerland (B.S.). Received September 6, 2002; revision requested November 7; final revision received February 24, 2003; accepted March 28. Address correspondence to D.W. (e-mail: dominik.weishaupt@dmr.usz.ch).

PURPOSE: To assess the technical feasibility of multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial bypass grafts and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability in the detection of graft-related complications, including graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-channel multi–detector row CT angiography was performed in 65 consecutive patients with 85 peripheral arterial bypass grafts. Each bypass graft was divided into three segments (proximal anastomosis, course of the graft body, and distal anastomosis), resulting in 255 segments. Two readers evaluated all CT angiograms with regard to image quality and the presence of bypass graft–related abnormalities, including graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas. The results were compared with McNemar test with Bonferroni correction. CT attenuation values were recorded at five different locations from the inflow artery to the outflow artery of the bypass graft. These findings were compared with the findings at duplex ultrasonography (US) in 65 patients and the findings at conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 27.

RESULTS: Image quality was rated as good or excellent in 250 (98%) and in 252 (99%) of 255 bypass segments, respectively. There was excellent agreement both between readers and between CT angiography and duplex US in the detection of graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas ( = 0.86–0.99). CT angiography and duplex US were compared with conventional DSA, and there was no statistically significant difference (P > .25) in sensitivity or specificity between CT angiography and duplex US for both readers for detection of hemodynamically significant bypass stenosis or occlusion, aneurysmal changes, or arteriovenous fistulas. Mean CT attenuation values ranged from 232 HU in the inflow artery to 281 HU in the outflow artery of the bypass graft.

CONCLUSION: Multi–detector row CT angiography may be an accurate and reliable technique after duplex US in the assessment of peripheral arterial bypass grafts and detection of graft-related complications, including stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Angiography, comparative studies, 921.12916, 924.12916 • Arteries, grafts and prostheses, 921.452, 924.452 • Arteries, peripheral, 921.452, 924.452 • Computed tomography, (CT) multi–detector row • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 921.12984, 924.12984

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. H. Lin, C. Bechara, P. Kougias, T. T. Huynh, S. A. LeMaire, and J. S. Coselli Assessment of Aortic Pathology and Peripheral Arterial Disease Using Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, December 1, 2009; 42(6): 583 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Lopera, C. K. Trimmer, S. G. Josephs, M. E. Anderson, S. Schuber, R. Li, B. Dolmatch, and B. Toursarkissian Multidetector CT Angiography of Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 529 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Schernthaner, D. Fleischmann, F. Lomoschitz, A. Stadler, J. Lammer, and C. Loewe Effect of MDCT Angiographic Findings on the Management of Intermittent Claudication Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Burrill, Z. Dabbagh, F. Gollub, and M. Hamady Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2007; 83(985): 698 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schertler, S. Wildermuth, H. Alkadhi, M. Kruppa, B. Marincek, and T. Boehm Sixteen-Detector Row CT Angiography for Lower-Leg Arterial Occlusive Disease: Analysis of Section Width Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 649 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-F. Ko, C.-C. Huang, S.-H. Ng, T.-Y. Lee, M.-J. Hsieh, F.-Y. Lee, M.-C. Chen, S.-M. Sheen-Chen, and C.-H. Lee MDCT Angiography for Evaluation of the Complete Vascular Tree of Hemodialysis Fistulas Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1268 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]