HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beam, C. A. Articles by Weinstein, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beam, C. A. Articles by Weinstein, S. P.

Evaluation of Proscriptive Health Care Policy Implementation in Screening Mammography¹

¹ From the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612-9497. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 4, 2002; revision requested February 6, 2003; final revision received May 13; accepted May 19. Supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA-74110. Address correspondence to C.A.B. (e-mail: beamca@moffitt.usf.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential effect of proscriptive health care policies directed toward improving screening mammogram interpretation in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percentiles of accuracy based on a random sample of 110 U.S. radiologists were used to examine the number of radiologists who would need to be restricted from providing mammographic interpretation to increase median accuracy from 66% to 67%, 71%, and 76%. In addition, reading volume data recorded for the sampled readers were used to project the percentage reduction in service volume (mammograms per year) that would result from restriction. Characteristics of participating radiologists were compared with those of nonparticipating radiologists by using ² testing and analysis of variance to assess the external validity of the results.

RESULTS: To increase median accuracy by 1% (from 66% to 67%) would require prohibiting about 2,200 U.S. radiologists (ie, the 11% in the lowest quantile for accuracy) from performing mammographic interpretation and would result in a reduction of yearly service volume of approximately 10%. An increase in median accuracy of 5% (to 71%) would require prohibiting about 6,000 U.S. radiologists (ie, 30%) from performing this service, with an accompanying volume reduction of 25%. An increase in median accuracy of 10% (to 77%) would require prohibiting about 11,400 practicing U.S. radiologists (ie, 57%) from performing this service and would diminish the national service capacity by 50%.

CONCLUSION: These data show that implementation of proscriptive health care policies based on accuracy would diminish the service capacity of screening mammography in the United States.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Breast radiography, utilization, 00.11 • Diagnostic radiology, observer performance • Radiology and radiologists • Radiology and radiologists, departmental management

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. S. Burnside, J. M. Park, J. P. Fine, and G. A. Sisney The Use of Batch Reading to Improve the Performance of Screening Mammography Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 790 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1840 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]