HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2343031811v1 234/3/929    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bédard, J. P. Articles by Monga, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bédard, J. P. Articles by Monga, E.

Pulmonary Embolism: Prospective Comparison of Iso-osmolar and Low-Osmolarity Nonionic Contrast Agents for Contrast Enhancement at CT Angiography¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001 12^e Ave Nord, Local 2525, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1H 5N4. Received November 10, 2003; revision requested February 3, 2004; revision received April 6; accepted May 24. Address correspondence to J.P.B. (e-mail: Raddiagn-Med@USherbrooke.ca).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate contrast enhancement on pulmonary computed tomographic (CT) angiograms obtained by using an iso-osmolar versus a low-osmolarity contrast agent to exclude pulmonary embolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Written patient consent was obtained on a form approved by the institutional review board, and the board approved the study. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial included 47 patients referred for multi–detector row CT angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism over a 5-month period. Patients received either iohexol or iodixanol as an intravenous contrast agent. Three radiologists independently evaluated enhancement homogeneity and quality in designated pulmonary artery branches at four consecutive levels in the lower lobe of the left lung from lobar to subsegmental arteries. This evaluation was performed at a workstation separately for homogeneity and quality with two different three-level scales established with consensus. Percentages of each given score were compared with the ² test. The mean attenuation (expressed in Hounsfield units) for each contrast agent was compared with Student t test, and interobserver agreement ( value) was calculated.

RESULTS: The percentages of arteries graded as excellent or not diagnostic were not statistically different (P > .05), with comparison of the two contrast agents at all levels. The intensity of enhancement (quantitative evaluation of enhancement by using mean attenuation of vessel lumen) was similar (P > .05) in the two groups. The values varied from 0.35 to 0.56 among readers.

CONCLUSION: Use of an iso-osmolar contrast agent at multi–detector row CT angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism did not significantly improve enhancement quality when this feature was compared with that of a low-osmolarity contrast agent.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Roggenland, S. A. Peters, S. P. Lemburg, T. Holland-Letz, V. Nicolas, and C. M. Heyer CT Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Impact of Patient Characteristics and Different Venous Lines on Vessel Enhancement and Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W351 - W359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Vrachliotis, K. G. Bis, A. Haidary, R. Kosuri, M. Balasubramaniam, M. Gallagher, G. Raff, M. Ross, B. O'Neil, and W. O'Neill Atypical Chest Pain: Coronary, Aortic, and Pulmonary Vasculature Enhancement at Biphasic Single-Injection 64-Section CT Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]