Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 4, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2351031301
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2351031301v1
235/1/197    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Graaf, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Graaf, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castelijns, J. A.
(Radiology 2005;235:197-207.)
© RSNA, 2005


Pediatric Imaging

Retinoblastoma: MR Imaging Parameters in Detection of Tumor Extent1

Pim de Graaf, MD, Frederik Barkhof, MD, PhD, Annette C. Moll, MD, PhD, Saskia M. Imhof, MD, PhD, Dirk L. Knol, PhD, Paul van der Valk, MD, PhD and Jonas A. Castelijns, MD, PhD, BSc

1 From the Departments of Radiology (P.d.G., F.B., J.A.C.), Ophthalmology (A.C.M., S.M.I.), Epidemiology and Statistics (D.L.K.), and Pathology (P.v.d.V.), VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Received August 15, 2003; revision requested October 31; final revision received April 20, 2004; accepted June 17. Address correspondence to P.d.G. (e-mail: p.degraaf@vumc.nl).

PURPOSE: To assess diagnostic accuracy of preoperatively performed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection of tumor extent in a large patient population with histopathologically proved retinoblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and informed consent were not required for retrospective review of patients’ images and records. Fifty-eight eyes in 28 girls (mean age, 21 months; range, 2–59 months) and 28 boys (mean age, 24 months; range, 2–76 months) with retinoblastoma were retrospectively reviewed by one radiologist on unenhanced T1-weighted, dual-echo T2-weighted, and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. MR imaging parameters such as growth pattern, anterior chamber hyperintensity, and involvement of choroid, ciliary body, optic nerve, sclera, orbital fat, and pineal gland were determined. Tumor volume was measured and correlated to metastatic risk factors. Imaging and pathologic findings were compared. Statistical analysis was performed by using logistic regression with log likelihood ratio {chi}2 test or Fisher exact test.

RESULTS: Choroidal invasion was suspected with MR imaging in 21 eyes; findings were false-positive in 13 eyes and false-negative in three (73% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 72% accuracy). Anterior chamber hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR images obtained after contrast agent administration correlated well with clinical presence of reactive neovascular processes. MR imaging findings were true-positive in 21 of 32 eyes with proved prelaminar optic nerve invasion (66% sensitivity) and false-positive in one (96% specificity, 79% accuracy). Postlaminar optic nerve invasion was correctly detected in two eyes; in two other eyes, this metastatic risk factor was missed (50% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 97% accuracy). Scleral and extrascleral tumor invasion were correctly excluded in all eyes. Tumor volume was statistically associated with prelaminar optic nerve invasion (P = .001) and choroidal invasion (P = .031).

CONCLUSION: MR imaging is accurate for tumor staging and detection of metastatic risk factors; detection of intraocular tumor infiltration remains difficult. Tumor volume, measured with MR imaging, was associated with prelaminar optic nerve and choroidal involvement.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. de Graaf, D. L. Knol, A. C. Moll, S. M. Imhof, A. Y. N. Schouten-van Meeteren, and J. A. Castelijns
Eye Size in Retinoblastoma: MR Imaging Measurements in Normal and Affected Eyes
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. M. Chung, C. S. Specht, and J. W. Schroeder
From the Archives of the AFIP: Pediatric Orbit Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions: Neuroepithelial Lesions of the Ocular Globe and Optic Nerve
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1159 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Micallef and D E Saunders
Paediatric head and neck imaging
Imaging, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 104 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P de Graaf, A C Moll, S M Imhof, P van der Valk, and J A Castelijns
Retinoblastoma and optic nerve enhancement on MRI: not always extraocular tumour extension
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2006; 90(6): 800 - 801.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.