Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352040406
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blandino, A.
(Radiology 2005;235:553-561.)
© RSNA, 2005


Musculoskeletal Imaging

CT and MR Imaging Findings in Athletes with Early Tibial Stress Injuries: Comparison with Bone Scintigraphy Findings and Emphasis on Cortical Abnormalities1

Michele Gaeta, MD, Fabio Minutoli, MD, Emanuele Scribano, MD, Giorgio Ascenti, MD, Sergio Vinci, MD, Daniele Bruschetta, MD, Ludovico Magaudda, MD and Alfredo Blandino, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiological Sciences (M.G., F.M., E.S., G.A., S.V., A.B.) and Sport Medicine (D.B., L.M.), University of Messina, Policlinico "G. Martino," Via Consolare Valeria, 98100 Messina, Italy. Received March 1, 2004; revision requested May 11; final revision received August 16; accepted September 8. Address correspondence to F.M. (e-mail: fminutoli@unime.it).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and bone scintigraphy in athletes with clinically suspected early stress injury of tibia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. A total of 42 patients experiencing tibial pain due to early stress injuries were evaluated. Eight patients had bilateral involvement; thus, 50 tibiae were evaluated. All patients underwent initial radiography that was negative for injury. MR imaging, CT, and bone scintigraphy were performed in all patients within 1 month of onset of symptoms. Ten asymptomatic volunteers served as the control group. Location of stress injuries, types of bone alterations, and presence of periosteal and bone marrow edema were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of MR imaging and CT were assessed, as was sensitivity of bone scintigraphy. McNemar test was used to detect statistically significant differences.

RESULTS: Sensitivity of MR imaging, CT, and bone scintigraphy was 88%, 42%, and 74%, respectively. Specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 90%, 100%, and 62%, respectively, for MR imaging and 100%, 52%, 100%, and 26%, respectively, for CT. Significant difference in detection of early tibial stress injuries was found between MR imaging and both CT and bone scintigraphy (McNemar test; P < .001 and P = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSION: MR imaging is the single best technique in assessment of patients with suspected tibial stress injuries; in some patients with negative MR imaging findings, CT can depict osteopenia, which is the earliest finding of fatigue cortical bone injury.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Gaeta, F. Minutoli, S. Mazziotti, C. Visalli, S. Vinci, F. Gaeta, and A. Blandino
Diagnostic Imaging in Athletes with Chronic Lower Leg Pain
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1412 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. Cabarrus, A. Ambekar, Y. Lu, and T. M. Link
MRI and CT of Insufficiency Fractures of the Pelvis and the Proximal Femur
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 995 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Beck, G. O. Matheson, G. Bergman, T. Norling, M. Fredericson, A. R. Hoffman, and R. Marcus
Do Capacitively Coupled Electric Fields Accelerate Tibial Stress Fracture Healing?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Fredericson, W. Moore, and S. Biswal
Sacral Stress Fractures: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Not Always Definitive for Early Stage Injuries: A Report of 2 Cases
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 835 - 839.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. S. Stacy and L. B. Dixon
Pitfalls in MR Image Interpretation Prompting Referrals to an Orthopedic Oncology Clinic
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 805 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
L Masci, J Pike, F Malara, B Phillips, K Bennell, P Brukner, C Standaert, and L Micheli
Use of the one-legged hyperextension test and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of active spondylolysis * Commentary * Commentary
Br. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2006; 40(11): 940 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Gaeta, F. Minutoli, S. Vinci, I. Salamone, L. D'Andrea, L. Bitto, L. Magaudda, and A. Blandino
High-resolution CT grading of tibial stress reactions in distance runners.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 789 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.