Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2371031636
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, J. A.
(Radiology 2005;237:3-7.)
© RSNA, 2005


Special Series

Responsible Conduct of Radiology Research

Part III. Exemptions from Regulatory Requirements for Human Research1

Jeffrey A. Cooper, MD, MMM

1 From the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, 915 15th St NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005-2315 and the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. Received October 8, 2003; revision requested January 5, 2004; revision received May 6; accepted June 14. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: jcooper{at}aahrpp.org).

The purpose of this series of articles is to explain the ethical and legal basis for responsible conduct of radiology research and the rules that an investigator needs to follow. In this article (part three of the series), the situations in which human research in radiology is exempt from regulatory requirements are explained. There are several situations in which an activity falls under the regulatory definition of research but is exempt from the research regulations. Investigators who conduct exempt research should know the regulatory criteria for the exemptions. In the case of research that is potentially exempt from the Department of Health and Human Services regulations, the institutional review board or an authority other than the investigator should make the determination of whether a proposed research activity is exempt from the regulations. For research exempt from Food and Drug Administration regulations, investigators should follow institutional guidance and seek input from the institutional review board or Food and Drug Administration for questionable cases.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Wolbarst and W. R. Hendee
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and NIH Grant Process: An Overview
Radiology, January 1, 2007; 242(1): 32 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Cooper
Responsible Conduct of Radiology Research Part IV. The Boundary of Research and Practice
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 383 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.