Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2372040616
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kock, M. C. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kock, M. C. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G. M.
(Radiology 2005;237:727-737.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

DSA versus Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial1

Marc C. J. M. Kock, MD, MSc, Miraude E. A. P. M. Adriaensen, MD, MSc2, Peter M. T. Pattynama, MD, PhD, Marc R. H. M. van Sambeek, MD, PhD, Hero van Urk, MD, PhD, Theo Stijnen, PhD and M. G. Myriam Hunink, MD, PhD

1 From the Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology (M.C.J.M.K., M.E.A.P.M.A., M.G.M.H.) and the Departments of Radiology (M.C.J.M.K., P.M.T.P., M.G.M.H.), Vascular Surgery (M.R.H.M.v.S., H.v.U.), and Epidemiology & Biostatistics (M.C.J.M.K., M.E.A.P.M.A., T.S., M.G.M.H.), Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 50, Rm Ee21-40a, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (M.G.M.H.) Received April 4, 2004; revision requested June 16; revision received November 18; accepted December 30. Address correspondence to M.G.M.H. (e-mail: m.hunink{at}erasmusmc.nl).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare therapeutic confidence in, patient outcomes (in terms of quality of life) after, and the costs of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with those of multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography as the initial diagnostic imaging test in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional medical ethics committee approval and patient informed consent were obtained. Between April 2000 and August 2001, patients with PAD were randomly assigned to undergo either DSA or multi–detector row CT angiography as the initial diagnostic imaging test. Outcomes were the therapeutic confidence assessed by physicians (on a scale from 0 to 10), the need for additional imaging, the health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up, diagnostic and therapeutic costs, and the costs for a hospital stay. Costs were computed from a hospital perspective according to Dutch guidelines for cost calculations in health care. Mean outcomes were compared between groups with unpaired t testing and were adjusted for predictive baseline characteristics with multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS: Among the 145 patients, 72 were randomly allocated to the DSA group and 73 to the CT angiography group. One patient in the DSA group had to be excluded. Mean age was 63 years in the DSA group and 64 years in the CT angiography group. There were 47 men in the DSA group and 58 men in the CT angiography group. Physician confidence in making a correct therapeutic choice was significantly higher at DSA (mean confidence score, 8.2) than at CT angiography (mean score, 7.2; P < .001). During 6-month follow-up, 14% less additional imaging was performed in the DSA group than in the CT angiography group (P = .3). No significant quality-of-life differences were found between groups. The diagnostic cost associated with DSA ({euro}564 ± 210 [standard deviation]) was significantly higher than that associated with CT angiography ({euro}363 ± 273), a difference of –{euro}201 (95% confidence interval: –{euro}281, –{euro}120; P < .001). Therapeutic and hospitalization costs were similar for both strategies.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that use of noninvasive multi–detector row CT angiography instead of DSA as the initial diagnostic imaging test for PAD provides sufficient information for therapeutic decision making and reduces imaging costs.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. E. Lopera, C. K. Trimmer, S. G. Josephs, M. E. Anderson, S. Schuber, R. Li, B. Dolmatch, and B. Toursarkissian
Multidetector CT Angiography of Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 529 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Schernthaner, D. Fleischmann, F. Lomoschitz, A. Stadler, J. Lammer, and C. Loewe
Effect of MDCT Angiographic Findings on the Management of Intermittent Claudication
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1215 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. E. Roos, D. Fleischmann, A. Koechl, T. Rakshe, M. Straka, A. Napoli, A. Kanitsar, M. Sramek, and E. Groeller
Multipath Curved Planar Reformation of the Peripheral Arterial Tree in CT Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 281 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Ouwendijk, M. C. J. M. Kock, L. C. van Dijk, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, T. Stijnen, and M. G. M. Hunink
Vessel Wall Calcifications at Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: Effect on Clinical Utility and Clinical Predictors
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 603 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.