HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2392050949v1 239/3/784    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Akin, O. Articles by Hricak, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Akin, O. Articles by Hricak, H.

Transition Zone Prostate Cancers: Features, Detection, Localization, and Staging at Endorectal MR Imaging¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (O.A., E.S., D.P., H.H.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.S.M., N.M.I.), Pathology (K.K.), and Urology (P.T.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. Received June 6, 2005; revision requested August 1; revision received August 9; accepted September 7; final version accepted October 10. Supported by NIH grant R01 CA76423. Address correspondence to O.A. (e-mail: akino{at}mskcc.org).

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection and local staging of transition zone prostate cancers, with pathologic analysis serving as the reference standard, and to assess MR imaging features of these cancers.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study and waived the informed consent requirement. An institutional database of 986 patients who underwent MR imaging before radical prostatectomy yielded 148 consecutive patients with at least one transition zone cancer at step-section pathologic analysis. An additional 46 patients without transition zone cancer were randomly selected as a control group. Two readers independently reviewed MR studies to identify patients with transition zone cancers and determine the location and local extent of these cancers. Imaging features that helped in the identification of transition zone cancers were recorded. Descriptive and statistics, as well as receiver operating characteristic and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used.

Results: For identification of patients with transition zone cancers, sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 87%, respectively, for reader 1 and 80% and 78%, respectively, for reader 2. Interreader agreement was fair. For detection of the location of transition zone cancer, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.75 for reader 1 and 0.73 for reader 2. Interreader agreement was fair. The readers' accuracy in detecting transition zone cancer foci increased significantly (P = .001) as tumor volume increased. In the detection of extraprostatic extension of transition zone cancers, sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 94%, respectively, for reader 1 and 28% and 93%, respectively, for reader 2. Homogeneous low T2 signal intensity (P = .001 for reader 1, P < .001 for reader 2) and lenticular shape (P = .017 for reader 1) were significantly associated with the presence of transition zone cancer.

Conclusion: MR imaging can be used to detect, localize, and stage transition zone prostate cancers.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. K. Lim, J. K. Kim, K. A. Kim, and K.-S. Cho Prostate Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map with T2-weighted Images for Detection--A Multireader Study Radiology, December 1, 2008; 250(1): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tamada, T. Sone, Y. Jo, A. Yamamoto, T. Yamashita, N. Egashira, S. Imai, and M. Fukunaga Prostate Cancer: Relationships between Postbiopsy Hemorrhage and Tumor Detectability at MR Diagnosis Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 531 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, J. J. Futterer, T. Hambrock, S. Takahashi, T. W. J. Scheenen, H. J. Huisman, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, B. C. Knipscheer, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, J. A. Witjes, et al. Prostate Cancer: Body-Array versus Endorectal Coil MR Imaging at 3 T--Comparison of Image Quality, Localization, and Staging Performance Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]