Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.

BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy1

Susan G. Orel, MD, Nicole Kay, BA, Carol Reynolds, MD and Daniel C. Sullivan, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (S.G.O., N.K.); the Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (C.R.); and the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Md (D.C.S.). From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 13, 1998; revision requested July 10; revision received August 17; accepted November 5. Address reprint requests to S.G.O.



View larger version (154K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Calcifications had been identified on an outside a screening mammogram in a 40-year-old woman, and follow-up diagnostic mammography was performed. Spot magnification mammogram obtained in the craniocaudal projection reveals a cluster of calcifications (arrow). The interpretation was punctate, questionably new calcifications, and a 6-month follow-up examination was recommended. Needle localization was performed, and solid-type DCIS measuring 0.8 cm was found. Repeat excision revealed residual DCIS measuring 1.2 cm, with negative margins of resection.

 


View larger version (152K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. New calcifications had been identified on a screening mammogram in a 68-year-old woman, and follow-up diagnostic mammography was performed. Spot magnification image reveals a cluster of calcifications (arrow). The interpretation was new but coarse calcifications. There were other coarse benign calcifications elsewhere in the breast. A 6-month follow-up examination was recommended. Needle localization was performed, and solid-type DCIS measuring 0.5 cm was found, with negative margins of resection.

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Outside 90° lateral spot magnification mammogram demonstrates calcifications (arrow) in a 47-year-old woman who had undergone left mastectomy and right reduction mammoplasty and who had outside images, including this image, at presentation. Review of several mammograms demonstrated coarsening of the calcifications, and the interpretation was probable fat necrosis following reduction mammoplasty. Needle localization revealed solid-type DCIS measuring 0.8 cm, with negative margins of resection.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.