Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azhari, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sazbon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azhari, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sazbon, D.

Volumetric Imaging with Ultrasonic Spiral CT1

Haim Azhari, DSc and Didi Sazbon, MSc

1 From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. Received September 15, 1997; revision requested November 24; final revision received November 20, 1998; accepted January 15, 1999. Supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation (grant Z-953/93), the Technion Vice Provost for Research Fund (J. Tal Equipment and Research Fund 130-304), the Irving and Adele Rosenberg Foundation, and the Israel Cancer Association (grants 960023-B and 972025-B). Address reprint requests to H.A. (e-mail: haim@biomed.technion.ac.il).



View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic illustrates A, conventional 3D reconstruction versus B, volumetric spiral reconstruction. A set of parallel cross sections is provided in A, whereas a single data set (volumetric) is obtained in B. Note that small objects located between two consecutive scanned planes may disappear in A.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. Plasticine spherical target. (a) Conventional 3D scan depicts four sections (slice 14) 10 mm apart (schematically illustrated on the left). Only the second section (slice 2) depicts a cross-sectional image of the upper part of the sphere. Note that the sphere would have been undetected with a slight change in section position. (b) Spiral CT scan was obtained with four spirals and 10-mm pitch (schematically illustrated on the left). The four sections (slice 58) depict cross sections located between the two dashed lines in the schematic and passing through the sphere. In this case, the spiral reconstruction consists of 16 sections.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. Plasticine spherical target. (a) Conventional 3D scan depicts four sections (slice 14) 10 mm apart (schematically illustrated on the left). Only the second section (slice 2) depicts a cross-sectional image of the upper part of the sphere. Note that the sphere would have been undetected with a slight change in section position. (b) Spiral CT scan was obtained with four spirals and 10-mm pitch (schematically illustrated on the left). The four sections (slice 58) depict cross sections located between the two dashed lines in the schematic and passing through the sphere. In this case, the spiral reconstruction consists of 16 sections.

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Hard-boiled egg phantom. Spiral reconstructions obtained with eight spiral windings and 10-mm pitch depict the following cross-sectional views: (a) axial, (b) longitudinal, and (c) oblique (tilted 35° relative to the axial plane).

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Hard-boiled egg phantom. Spiral reconstructions obtained with eight spiral windings and 10-mm pitch depict the following cross-sectional views: (a) axial, (b) longitudinal, and (c) oblique (tilted 35° relative to the axial plane).

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Hard-boiled egg phantom. Spiral reconstructions obtained with eight spiral windings and 10-mm pitch depict the following cross-sectional views: (a) axial, (b) longitudinal, and (c) oblique (tilted 35° relative to the axial plane).

 


View larger version (189K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a. Breast biopsy phantom. Spiral reconstructions, obtained with 16 spirals and 5-mm pitch, consist of 128 x 128 x 64 voxels of 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.25 mm. Abnormal tissue targets (arrows) are clearly visible. (a) Coronal cross section 10 (of 64). (b) Axial cross section 56 (of 128). (c) Sagittal cross section 80 (of 128).

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b. Breast biopsy phantom. Spiral reconstructions, obtained with 16 spirals and 5-mm pitch, consist of 128 x 128 x 64 voxels of 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.25 mm. Abnormal tissue targets (arrows) are clearly visible. (a) Coronal cross section 10 (of 64). (b) Axial cross section 56 (of 128). (c) Sagittal cross section 80 (of 128).

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4c. Breast biopsy phantom. Spiral reconstructions, obtained with 16 spirals and 5-mm pitch, consist of 128 x 128 x 64 voxels of 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.25 mm. Abnormal tissue targets (arrows) are clearly visible. (a) Coronal cross section 10 (of 64). (b) Axial cross section 56 (of 128). (c) Sagittal cross section 80 (of 128).

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Breast biopsy phantom. On the 3D computer rendering, the phantom was virtually cut about 10 mm from its base to enable a look inside at its lesions. This type of presentation may provide a better orientation to the physician and may help plan more effective surgical procedures.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.