Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 1, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2223010524
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neish, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinks, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neish, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Spinks, A. J.
(Radiology 2002;222:709-714.)
© RSNA, 2002

Screening for Stroke in Sickle Cell Anemia: Comparison of Transcranial Doppler Imaging and Nonimaging US Techniques1

Ariane S. Neish, MD, David E. Blews, MD, Catherine A. Simms, RN, Robert K. Merritt, MA and Alice J. Spinks, RDMS

1 From the Department of Radiology, Children’s Health Care of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, 1001 Johnson Ferry Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30342. Received February 27, 2001; revision requested April 2; final revision received September 14; accepted September 20. Funding for purchase of Nicolet Companion EME Transcranial Doppler machine was provided by the Children’s Health Care of Atlanta Foundation. Address correspondence to A.S.N. (e-mail: ariane.neish@choa.org).



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bar graph shows comparison of velocity readings in centimeters per second obtained at nonimaging transcranial Doppler US with a Nicolet machine (black bars) and those obtained at transcranial Doppler US imaging with GE or Acuson machines (white bars). No significant differences in velocity measurements were found in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), distal internal carotid artery (ICA), or anterior cerebral artery (ACA). However, significant differences were identified in velocity readings in the bifurcation of the distal internal carotid artery (BIF), in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and in the basilar artery (BA). The values reported represent means of velocities of the data reported in Table 1.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graph shows comparison of RIs obtained at nonimaging transcranial Doppler US with a Nicolet machine (black bars) and those obtained at transcranial Doppler US imaging with GE or Acuson machines (white bars). The values reported represent means of RIs calculated from the data reported in Table 1. The graph depicts significant differences in RI measurements for every vessel. ACA = anterior cerebral artery, BA = basilar artery, BIF = bifurcation of the distal internal carotid artery, ICA = internal carotid artery, MCA = middle cerebral artery, PCA = posterior cerebral artery.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.