Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print March 15, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2352040422
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sumkin, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sumkin, J. H.

Trends in Recall, Biopsy, and Positive Biopsy Rates for Screening Mammography in an Academic Practice1

David Gur, ScD, Luisa P. Wallace, MD, Amy H. Klym, BS, Lara A. Hardesty, MD, Gordon S. Abrams, MD, Ratan Shah, MD and Jules H. Sumkin, DO

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh and Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket St, Imaging Research, Suite 4200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180. Received March 9, 2004; revision requested May 11; final revision received July 21; accepted August 4. Supported in part by grants CA77850 and CA84241 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. Address correspondence to D.G. (e-mail: gurd@upmc.edu).



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Plot shows the biopsy rates per 1000 screening examinations for each calendar quarter. The fitted line is a linear least squares fit of the observed data.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Plot shows the percentage of malignant biopsies for each calendar quarter. The fitted line is a linear least squares fit of the observed data.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Plot shows the stereotactic (11-gauge) vacuum-assisted core biopsy rates per 1000 screening examinations for each calendar quarter. The fitted line is a linear least squares fit of the observed data.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.