Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 29, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2352040437
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kealey, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eastwood, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kealey, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eastwood, J. D.

Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Normal and Degenerated Intervertebral Lumbar Disks: Initial Experience1

Susan M. Kealey, FFR, RCSI, Todd Aho, MD, David Delong, PhD, Daniel P. Barboriak, MD, James M. Provenzale, MD and James D. Eastwood, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology (S.M.K., D.P.B., J.M.P., J.D.E.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (D.D.), Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC (S.M.K., D.P.B., J.M.P., J.D.E.); and Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (T.A.). Received March 5, 2004; revision requested May 11; revision received June 8; accepted July 20. Address correspondence to S.M.K. (e-mail keale001@mc.duke.edu).



View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a. MR images of lumbar spine in 57-year-old man. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted MR image with ROI placed over water tube on participant’s back. Intervertebral disk at L4-5 was designated as showing reduction in T2 signal intensity and loss of intervertebral cleft with preservation of disk height. ROI has been placed centrally on intervertebral disk at L4-5. Sagittal plane of acquisition permits optimum placement of ROI, avoiding inclusion of portions of anulus fibrosis and vertebral end plates. (b) Corresponding diffusion-weighted image (b value, 400 sec/mm2; 1215/80; section thickness, 6 mm; section gap, 1 mm; and six signals acquired) and (c) ADC map derived from b, with ROI placed over L4-5 intervertebral disk.

 


View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b. MR images of lumbar spine in 57-year-old man. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted MR image with ROI placed over water tube on participant’s back. Intervertebral disk at L4-5 was designated as showing reduction in T2 signal intensity and loss of intervertebral cleft with preservation of disk height. ROI has been placed centrally on intervertebral disk at L4-5. Sagittal plane of acquisition permits optimum placement of ROI, avoiding inclusion of portions of anulus fibrosis and vertebral end plates. (b) Corresponding diffusion-weighted image (b value, 400 sec/mm2; 1215/80; section thickness, 6 mm; section gap, 1 mm; and six signals acquired) and (c) ADC map derived from b, with ROI placed over L4-5 intervertebral disk.

 


View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1c. MR images of lumbar spine in 57-year-old man. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted MR image with ROI placed over water tube on participant’s back. Intervertebral disk at L4-5 was designated as showing reduction in T2 signal intensity and loss of intervertebral cleft with preservation of disk height. ROI has been placed centrally on intervertebral disk at L4-5. Sagittal plane of acquisition permits optimum placement of ROI, avoiding inclusion of portions of anulus fibrosis and vertebral end plates. (b) Corresponding diffusion-weighted image (b value, 400 sec/mm2; 1215/80; section thickness, 6 mm; section gap, 1 mm; and six signals acquired) and (c) ADC map derived from b, with ROI placed over L4-5 intervertebral disk.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph of mean ADC values in normal-appearing disks. ADC values are indicated in units of x10–6 mm2/sec. Disk levels 1-5 refer to L1-2 through L5-S1. ADC values of normal disks decrease as one proceeds in caudal direction, a pattern that parallels prevalence of degenerative disk disease in our study population. There was a statistically significant difference in ADC values between L1-2 and L5-S1 disks and between L2-3 and L5-S1 disks, with a trend toward significance between L1-2 and L4-5 disks.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.