Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 27, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2361040560
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huisman, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.

Prostate Cancer: Precision of Integrating Functional MR Imaging with Radiation Therapy Treatment by Using Fiducial Gold Markers1

Henkjan J. Huisman, MS, PhD, Jurgen J. Fütterer, MD, Emile N. J. T. van Lin, MD, Arjan Welmers, MD, Tom W. J. Scheenen, MS, PhD, Jorn A. van Dalen, MS, PhD, Andries G. Visser, MS, PhD, J. A. Witjes, MD, PhD and Jelle O. Barentsz, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.J.H., J.J.F., A.W., T.W.J.S., J.A.v.D., J.O.B.), Radiotherapy (E.N.J.T.v.L., A.G.V.), and Urology (J.A.W.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, NL 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Received March 26, 2004; revision requested June 8; revision received August 20; accepted October 1. Address correspondence to H.J.H. (e-mail: h.huisman{at}rad.umcn.nl).



View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Transverse CT (left) and T2*-weighted MR (right) images (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters) before image registration. Markers appear as bright spots at CT (arrows) and as dark spots at MR imaging.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Fused display of transverse T2*-weighted MR (gray value) and CT (red overlay) images for validation of registration (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). CT markers overlay transverse T2*-weighted markers completely, which confirms good prostate registration. Notice bone landmark shift (arrows) illustrating inability to register prostate by using bone landmarks.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Images show integration of T2-weighted MR, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR, and 3D spectroscopic image information into a single tumor map (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). (a) T2-weighted MR image shows hypointense area in sagittal (left), coronal (center), and transverse (right) position fused with (b) volume transfer constant, (c) wash-out phase, and (d) choline-to-citrate ratio (see body text for explanation of parameters), all of which confirm DIL position. (e) Red DIL outline is visualized according to its cross section.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Images show integration of T2-weighted MR, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR, and 3D spectroscopic image information into a single tumor map (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). (a) T2-weighted MR image shows hypointense area in sagittal (left), coronal (center), and transverse (right) position fused with (b) volume transfer constant, (c) wash-out phase, and (d) choline-to-citrate ratio (see body text for explanation of parameters), all of which confirm DIL position. (e) Red DIL outline is visualized according to its cross section.

 


View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Images show integration of T2-weighted MR, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR, and 3D spectroscopic image information into a single tumor map (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). (a) T2-weighted MR image shows hypointense area in sagittal (left), coronal (center), and transverse (right) position fused with (b) volume transfer constant, (c) wash-out phase, and (d) choline-to-citrate ratio (see body text for explanation of parameters), all of which confirm DIL position. (e) Red DIL outline is visualized according to its cross section.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3d. Images show integration of T2-weighted MR, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR, and 3D spectroscopic image information into a single tumor map (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). (a) T2-weighted MR image shows hypointense area in sagittal (left), coronal (center), and transverse (right) position fused with (b) volume transfer constant, (c) wash-out phase, and (d) choline-to-citrate ratio (see body text for explanation of parameters), all of which confirm DIL position. (e) Red DIL outline is visualized according to its cross section.

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3e. Images show integration of T2-weighted MR, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR, and 3D spectroscopic image information into a single tumor map (see Table 1 for MR imaging parameters). (a) T2-weighted MR image shows hypointense area in sagittal (left), coronal (center), and transverse (right) position fused with (b) volume transfer constant, (c) wash-out phase, and (d) choline-to-citrate ratio (see body text for explanation of parameters), all of which confirm DIL position. (e) Red DIL outline is visualized according to its cross section.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a. Images show (a) registered tumor map overlaid in red on top of transverse treatment-planning CT image and (b) radiation therapy treatment plan. Notice how boost dose area conforms to DIL area demonstrated at MR imaging.

 


View larger version (153K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b. Images show (a) registered tumor map overlaid in red on top of transverse treatment-planning CT image and (b) radiation therapy treatment plan. Notice how boost dose area conforms to DIL area demonstrated at MR imaging.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar graphs demonstrate relative frequency (y axis) of prostate registration errors (x axis) for ICP (top graphs) and landmark (bottom graphs) registration methods at centroid (left graphs) and rim location (right graphs). Notice broader error distribution for landmark method.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.