Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 28, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2372041461
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Im, J.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Im, J.-G.

Computer-aided Diagnosis of Localized Ground-Glass Opacity in the Lung at CT: Initial Experience1

Kwang Gi Kim, MS, Jin Mo Goo, MD, Jong Hyo Kim, PhD, Hyun Ju Lee, MD, Byung Goo Min, PhD, Kyongtae T. Bae, MD, PhD and Jung-Gi Im, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea (K.G.K., J.M.G., J.H.K., H.J.L., J.G.I.); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (B.G.M.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.T.B.). Received August 23, 2004; revision requested October 28; revision received November 19; accepted December 24. Supported in part by Seoul National University Hospital Research Grant (0420030300) and by a grant from the Korea Health 21 Research and Development Project-Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (03-PJ1-PG10-51300-0006). Address correspondence to J.M.G. (e-mail: jmgoo{at}plaza.snu.ac.kr).



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph depicts ROC curve of neural network for classification of GGO ROIs and non-GGO ROIs. Az = 0.92.

 


View larger version (103K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. CT scans obtained with threshold of 0.9 demonstrate true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings. (a) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in right middle lobe. Although dependent opacity (arrowheads) can be categorized as GGO according to attenuation, these areas were correctly classified as negative (true-negative finding). (b) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows localized GGO (arrow) in right upper lobe that was not detected (false-negative finding). (c) Transverse CT scan in 73-year-old woman shows false-positive finding (arrow) near airways and vessel. Arrowhead indicates true-positive finding. (d) Transverse CT scan in 61-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in left upper lobe. Arrowheads indicate false-positive finding that was caused by artifact.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. CT scans obtained with threshold of 0.9 demonstrate true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings. (a) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in right middle lobe. Although dependent opacity (arrowheads) can be categorized as GGO according to attenuation, these areas were correctly classified as negative (true-negative finding). (b) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows localized GGO (arrow) in right upper lobe that was not detected (false-negative finding). (c) Transverse CT scan in 73-year-old woman shows false-positive finding (arrow) near airways and vessel. Arrowhead indicates true-positive finding. (d) Transverse CT scan in 61-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in left upper lobe. Arrowheads indicate false-positive finding that was caused by artifact.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2c. CT scans obtained with threshold of 0.9 demonstrate true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings. (a) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in right middle lobe. Although dependent opacity (arrowheads) can be categorized as GGO according to attenuation, these areas were correctly classified as negative (true-negative finding). (b) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows localized GGO (arrow) in right upper lobe that was not detected (false-negative finding). (c) Transverse CT scan in 73-year-old woman shows false-positive finding (arrow) near airways and vessel. Arrowhead indicates true-positive finding. (d) Transverse CT scan in 61-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in left upper lobe. Arrowheads indicate false-positive finding that was caused by artifact.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2d. CT scans obtained with threshold of 0.9 demonstrate true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative findings. (a) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in right middle lobe. Although dependent opacity (arrowheads) can be categorized as GGO according to attenuation, these areas were correctly classified as negative (true-negative finding). (b) Transverse CT scan in 69-year-old woman shows localized GGO (arrow) in right upper lobe that was not detected (false-negative finding). (c) Transverse CT scan in 73-year-old woman shows false-positive finding (arrow) near airways and vessel. Arrowhead indicates true-positive finding. (d) Transverse CT scan in 61-year-old woman shows true-positive finding (arrow) in left upper lobe. Arrowheads indicate false-positive finding that was caused by artifact.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.