Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041508
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itagaki, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pile-Spellman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itagaki, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pile-Spellman, J.

Factors Associated with Academic Radiology Research Productivity1

Michael W. Itagaki, MD, MBA and John Pile-Spellman, MD

1 From the University of Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, Ill (M.W.I.); and Department of Radiology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY (J.P.). Received August 31, 2004; revision requested November 8; revision received December 15; accepted January 18, 2005. Address correspondence to M.W.I., Department of Medicine, Winthrop University Hospital, 222 Station Plaza North, Suite 509, Mineola, NY 11501 (e-mail: mitagaki{at}gmail.com).



View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Regression analysis study variables.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Graph shows estimates of the cost of articles and publication impact units on the departmental and individual levels, with 95% confidence intervals (error bars). These estimates were derived with the four statistical models, with the mean estimate representing the average of the departmental and individual faculty estimates for the given productivity measure.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Graph shows cumulative percentages of total articles, case reports, review articles, and reports of clinical trials from medical school radiology departments according to departmental NIH funding rank. Well-funded departments accounted for far more articles than poorly funded departments.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.