Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2411051375
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geller, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geller, B. M.

Improving the Concordance of Mammography Assessment and Management Recommendations1

Berta M. Geller, EdD, Laura E. Ichikawa, MS, Diana S. M. Buist, PhD, Edward A. Sickles, MD, Patricia A. Carney, PhD, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, PhD, Mark Dignan, PhD, Karla Kerlikowske, MD, K. Robin Yabroff, PhD, MBA, William Barlow, PhD, Robert D. Rosenberg, MD, For the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

1 From the Office of Health Promotion Research, University of Vermont, 1 S Prospect St, Rm 4427D, Burlington, VT 05401-3444 (B.M.G.); Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Wash (L.E.I., D.S.M.B., W.B.); University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (E.A.S., K.K.); Dartmouth Medical School, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH (P.A.C.); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (B.C.Y.); Cooper Institute, Denver, Colo (M.D.); Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (K.R.Y.); and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (R.D.R.). Received August 16, 2005; revision requested October 21; revision received November 28; final version accepted January 2, 2006. Data collection supported by a National Cancer Institute–funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium cooperative agreement (U01CA63740, U01CA86076, U01CA86082, U01CA63736, U01CA70013, U01CA69976, U01CA63731, U01CA70040). Address correspondence to B.M.G. (e-mail: berta.geller{at}uvm.edu).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1: Concordance of mammography assessment and recommendation between the pre-MQSA period and the post-MQSA period for initial assessment of screening mammograms.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2: Concordance of mammography assessment and recommendation between the pre-MQSA period and the post-MQSA period for final assessment of screening mammograms.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3: Concordance of mammography assessment and recommendation between the pre-MQSA period and the post-MQSA period for final assessment of diagnostic mammograms.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.