Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.
(Radiology. 1999;210:443-450.)
© RSNA, 1999


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Hepatic Nodules in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Imaging Features

Valérie Vilgrain, MD1, Maïté Lewin, MD1, Corinne Vons, MD5, Alban Denys, MD1, Dominique Valla, MD2, Jean-François Flejou, MD3, Jacques Belghiti, MD4 and Yves Menu, MD1

1 Departments of Radiology (V.V., M.L., A.D., Y.M.)
2 Hepatology (D.V.)
3 Pathology (J.F.F.)
4 Digestive Surgery (J.B.), Hôpital Beaujon, 100 bd du General Leclerc, 92118 Clichy, France
5 Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Antoine Beclere, Clamart, France (C.V.).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To analyze the imaging features of nodules associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively studied images obtained in 23 patients with liver nodules who were being followed up for Budd-Chiari syndrome. Doppler ultrasonography was performed in all patients, computed tomography in 16, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in 20. The following lesion features were evaluated: location, number, size, vascularization, qualitative signal intensity at MR imaging, and homogeneity. Nodules were diagnosed on the basis of histopathologic findings or clinical and biologic data with no change at imaging during 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS: All patients had histopathologic features of chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome. Four patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with one to three lesions. The mean diameter of the largest HCC lesion in each patient was 7.3 cm. All HCC lesions were heterogeneous and had high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. Nineteen patients had multiple benign regenerative nodules, most of which were smaller than 4 cm. Most nodules were homogeneous and hyperintense on T1- and T2-weighted images. In 15 patients, nodules were hypervascular in the arterial phase.

CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome, multiple (>10) small (<4-cm) lesions are suggestive of benignity.

Index terms: Hepatic veins, thrombosis, 761.659 • Liver, CT, 761.1211 • Liver, MR, 761.12143 • Liver, nodules, 761.3198 • Liver, US, 761.1298 • Liver neoplasms, blood supply • Liver neoplasms, diagnosis, 761.3198, 761.323


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Budd-Chiari syndrome is a disorder with numerous causes that is a result of hepatic outflow obstruction. In Western countries, it is commonly associated with thrombogenic conditions such as myeloproliferative disorders, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, the use of oral contraceptives, and coagulation disorders of various causes. Budd-Chiari syndrome may also be the result of malignant thrombosis of the inferior vena cava or major hepatic veins. Furthermore, although membranous obstruction of the inferior vena cava has been mentioned as another cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome, it has recently been shown to be most probably a sequela of thrombosis than the cause (1).

The prognosis of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome has been considered poor for many years. Recent advances in imaging techniques have enabled early diagnosis, recognition of asymptomatic cases, and surgical treatment (eg, portacaval anastomosis) and have resulted in better survival rates in these patients (2). At the same time, the nodules associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome have been described in the literature and include mostly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and benign regenerative nodules (1,37), which are also called adenomatous hyperplastic nodules (4), nodular regenerative hyperplasia (5,6), and regenerative nodules (7). Very few studies have reported imaging findings about these nodules, and, to our knowledge, the vascularization of nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome has not been evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (4,5).

The objectives of this study were as follows: (a) to describe the imaging features of nodules in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, (b) to compare the imaging characteristics of benign nodules with those of HCC, and (c) to determine the etiology of these benign regenerative nodules.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Patients
Images from patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome from two hepatobiliary units were retrospectively reviewed. The following inclusion criteria were used: (a) diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome on the basis of histopathologic specimens obtained by means of percutaneous or surgical biopsy, (b) at least one liver nodule detected with ultrasonography (US) at diagnosis or during follow-up (a nodule was defined as a round, well-circumscribed lesion), and (c) the absence of compression or obstruction of the main hepatic veins or inferior vena cava due to space-occupying lesions. Of 77 patients in whom imaging studies were performed, 28 had liver nodules. Five of these 28 patients were excluded because no retrospective imaging data were available (n = 2) or because the liver lesions were not definitely diagnosed (n = 3).

Nodules were diagnosed on the basis of histopathologic analysis of specimens obtained by means of surgical resection or surgical or percutaneous biopsy or on the basis of clinical and biologic data combined with follow-up. Malignant cells at histologic examination, serum {alpha}-fetoprotein level greater than 250 ng/mL, or both were the criteria for a malignant lesion. The absence of malignant cells with findings suggestive of regenerative nodules at histologic examination (8) or no change in the imaging appearance of the lesions for at least 2 years with serum {alpha}-fetoprotein levels less than 10 ng/mL during follow-up were the criteria for a benign lesion.

The diagnosis of nodules was made at histopathologic examination in all but 10 patients. Two of the 10 patients had coagulation disorders, and eight were receiving anticoagulation therapy. Specimens were obtained after surgical resection in two patients, surgical biopsy in seven patients, and percutaneous needle biopsy in four patients. Histologic analysis of these specimens was reviewed by one experienced liver pathologist (J.F.F.). Microscopic analysis was performed, and the lesions were classified according to the guidelines of the International Working Party (8). The diagnosis of the nodules in the remaining 10 patients was made on the basis of clinical and biologic data combined with follow-up.

The images from the 23 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and associated hepatic nodules were retrospectively analyzed. There were five men and 18 women ranging in age from 22 to 64 (mean, 38.5) years. Nodules were discovered at diagnosis of hepatic venous outflow obstruction (n = 4) or during follow-up (n = 19). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 14 years after diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome (mean, 6 years) (Fig 1). All patients had histopathologic features of chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome, including sinusoidal dilatation, centrolobular congestion, and areas of marked fibrosis. None of the patients had positive markers for viral hepatitis. The following etiologic factors were found in 20 patients: myeloproliferative syndrome (n = 12), which was associated in one patient with a membranous obstruction of the inferior vena cava; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (n = 3); coagulation disorders (n = 2); and antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 2). One patient had isolated membranous obstruction of the inferior vena cava. Eighteen patients had previously undergone creation of a portosystemic shunt. Shunts were mesocaval (n = 13), mesoatrial or innominate (n = 3), portacaval (n = 1), and mesorenal (n = 1).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Interval between diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome and lesions.

 
Imaging
Doppler US was performed in all patients, CT in 16, and MR imaging in 20. Doppler US was performed with a model UM 9 (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Wash) or 128 XP/10 (Acuson, Mountain View, Calif) unit. Helical CT was performed in 14 patients (CT twin unit; Elscint, Haifa, Israel). All patients underwent our routine protocol for the examination of liver tumors. CT sections were collimated to 5 mm at a pitch of 1. Images were obtained during an arterial-phase helix and a portal-phase helix (25–50 and 60–85 seconds, respectively) after initiation of intravenous administration of a 120–140-mL bolus of nonionic contrast material at a rate of 3 mL/sec. In two patients, CT was performed with a model 9800 system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis), with 10-mm contiguous sections obtained at 10-mm intervals. The dynamic study was started after administration of a 50-mL bolus of nonionic contrast material. A total volume of 120–140 mL of contrast material was administered at a rate of 3 mL/sec.

MR imaging was performed with a 2.0-T (Elscint) (n = 18) or 0.5-T (MR Max Plus; GE Medical Systems) (n = 2) superconducting system. Conventional or fast spin-echo T2- and T1-weighted MR images were obtained in all but one patient, in whom only T1-weighted images were obtained. In addition, 19 patients received a bolus (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany) before acquisition of dynamic gradient-recalled echo images.

Image Analysis
Image analysis of liver lesions was performed by two radiologists who were aware of the diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome but not of the nodules. The diagnosis was made by consensus.

The following lesion criteria were evaluated: (a) location; (b) number; (c) size of the largest lesions in each patient; (d) sonographic pattern; (e) attenuation at unenhanced CT; (f) signal intensity at MR imaging; (g) lesion vascularization with contrast material–enhanced CT, MR imaging, or both; (h) homogeneous or heterogeneous appearance at US, CT, or MR imaging; and (i) presence of a peripheral rim at US, CT, or MR imaging. Three other items were also assessed: enlargement of the hepatic artery (defined as a main hepatic artery diameter larger than that of the splenic artery) on contrast-enhanced CT images or Doppler US scans, portal vein patency and direction at Doppler US, and patency of surgical portosystemic shunts on Doppler studies and/or contrast-enhanced CT and MR images, when available.

Follow-up
Twenty patients underwent follow-up for more than 2 years, including 19 patients with benign regenerative nodules and one patient with HCC. Comparison of the serial imaging features was made with US (20 patients), CT (eight patients), and MR imaging (12 patients). The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (range, 2–8 years).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
HCC Lesions
HCC was confirmed by means of histopathologic examination in four patients. In three patients, the diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome and HCC was made simultaneously. Serum {alpha}-fetoprotein markers were normal in one patient and markedly increased in the three others (292, 1,600, and 10,200 ng/mL, respectively). A solitary lesion was found in three patients. These lesions were 4.5–8.0 cm in diameter (mean, 6.5 cm) (Fig 2). One patient had three lesions with diameters of 10.0, 2.0, and 1.5 cm. Therefore, the mean diameter of the largest lesion in each patient was 7.3 cm and that for all lesions was 5.5 cm. Four of the HCC lesions were located in the right lobe, and two were located in the left lobe. Lesion characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All tumors were heterogeneous on T2-weighted images. No peripheral rim was detected at US, CT, or MR imaging. Enlargement of the hepatic artery was observed in one patient.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a. HCC. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the tumor in the left lobe (arrowheads) has heterogeneous enhancement. Dilatation of the azygos (A) and hemiazygos (H) veins is seen. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 3,250/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows the high-signal-intensity lesion (arrowheads). Ascites and dilatation of the azygos (A) and hemiazygos (H) veins are seen.

 


View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b. HCC. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the tumor in the left lobe (arrowheads) has heterogeneous enhancement. Dilatation of the azygos (A) and hemiazygos (H) veins is seen. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 3,250/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows the high-signal-intensity lesion (arrowheads). Ascites and dilatation of the azygos (A) and hemiazygos (H) veins are seen.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Summary of Lesion Features in Patients with HCC
 
Doppler US showed antegrade portal flow in three patients and complete portal obstruction in one patient. One of the four patients had an obstructed mesoatrial shunt at tumor diagnosis, and one had a patent mesocaval shunt. Two patients did not have surgical portosystemic shunts. A follow-up of more than 2 years was possible in only one patient with HCC, and an increase in tumor size (from 4.5 to 7.0 cm in 8 years) was seen with the same imaging technique. One patient died 6 months after diagnosis. The other two patients are alive: One underwent surgical resection of the lesion, and the other underwent percutaneous ethanol ablation therapy.

Benign Regenerative Nodules
Nineteen patients had benign regenerative nodules, and all 19 had normal serum {alpha}-fetoprotein markers (<10 ng/mL). In nine patients, the diagnosis was confirmed at histopathologic examination and the lesions were identified as benign multiacinar regenerative nodules (8). Nodules were composed of moderately enlarged hepatocyte plates (two to three cells thick) without nuclear atypia. In four patients, intranodular cholestasis was present, with an acinar architecture of hepatocytes around the bile plugs. When the specimen was large enough, portal tracts were identified within the nodule. It is interesting that although congestion was usually present in the extranodular parenchyma, it was absent in the nodules. In all but one patient, benign regenerative nodules were discovered during follow-up of Budd-Chiari syndrome from 1 to 14 years. Lesions were multiple in all patients. Fifteen of the 19 patients with benign regenerative nodules had more than 10 lesions within the liver at CT or MR imaging (Fig 3). Among these patients, 12 had more than 10 lesions at US and three patients had one lesion, two lesions, and three lesions, respectively. The other four patients had three to six lesions at US, CT, and/or MR imaging, and these lesions were disseminated throughout the liver in no specific location.



View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Longitudinal US scan of the right lobe of the liver shows multiple homogeneous and hypoechoic nodules. One nodule is seen between calipers. Ascites (A) is also shown. (b) Unenhanced helical CT scan shows multiple, small, hyperattenuating lesions. Ascites (A) is seen, as is the mesoatrial surgical shunt (S). (c) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked homogeneous enhancement. Ascites (A) is seen. The mesoatrial surgical shunt (S) did not enhance after injection of contrast material and was determined to be obstructed.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Longitudinal US scan of the right lobe of the liver shows multiple homogeneous and hypoechoic nodules. One nodule is seen between calipers. Ascites (A) is also shown. (b) Unenhanced helical CT scan shows multiple, small, hyperattenuating lesions. Ascites (A) is seen, as is the mesoatrial surgical shunt (S). (c) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked homogeneous enhancement. Ascites (A) is seen. The mesoatrial surgical shunt (S) did not enhance after injection of contrast material and was determined to be obstructed.

 


View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Longitudinal US scan of the right lobe of the liver shows multiple homogeneous and hypoechoic nodules. One nodule is seen between calipers. Ascites (A) is also shown. (b) Unenhanced helical CT scan shows multiple, small, hyperattenuating lesions. Ascites (A) is seen, as is the mesoatrial surgical shunt (S). (c) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked homogeneous enhancement. Ascites (A) is seen. The mesoatrial surgical shunt (S) did not enhance after injection of contrast material and was determined to be obstructed.

 
The mean diameter of the largest benign lesion in each patient was 3.3 cm (range, 0.5–7.0 cm). In 15 patients, lesions were smaller than 4.0 cm in diameter (Fig 4). In four patients, the largest lesion was 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, and 7.0 cm in diameter; however, these patients had more than 10 small nodules identified at imaging. Lesion characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Benign lesions were homogeneous in 11 of the 19 patients (Fig 5). A peripheral rim was observed in the largest lesion in two patients at US, CT, and/or MR imaging and was not confirmed at histopathologic examination. Pathologic examination was, however, performed with specimens from needle biopsy.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows multiple hyperattenuating masses in the liver. Enlargement of the spleen (Sp) is also shown. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (4,080/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have moderately high signal intensity. The decreased signal intensity in the posterior part of the spleen may be due to the field inhomogeneity of the MR unit. (c) Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows multiple hyperintense lesions. (d) Gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo T1-weighted MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked enhancement.

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows multiple hyperattenuating masses in the liver. Enlargement of the spleen (Sp) is also shown. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (4,080/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have moderately high signal intensity. The decreased signal intensity in the posterior part of the spleen may be due to the field inhomogeneity of the MR unit. (c) Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows multiple hyperintense lesions. (d) Gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo T1-weighted MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked enhancement.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4c. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows multiple hyperattenuating masses in the liver. Enlargement of the spleen (Sp) is also shown. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (4,080/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have moderately high signal intensity. The decreased signal intensity in the posterior part of the spleen may be due to the field inhomogeneity of the MR unit. (c) Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows multiple hyperintense lesions. (d) Gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo T1-weighted MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked enhancement.

 


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4d. Benign regenerative nodules. (a) Contrast-enhanced helical CT scan obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows multiple hyperattenuating masses in the liver. Enlargement of the spleen (Sp) is also shown. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (4,080/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have moderately high signal intensity. The decreased signal intensity in the posterior part of the spleen may be due to the field inhomogeneity of the MR unit. (c) Unenhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows multiple hyperintense lesions. (d) Gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo T1-weighted MR image (160/4.9; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) obtained during the hepatic arterial phase shows that the lesions (arrowheads) have marked enhancement.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Summary of Lesion Features in Patients with Benign Regenerative Nodules
 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a. Atypical benign regenerative nodule. (a) T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (450/15; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows a large, heterogeneous lesion (arrows) in the right lobe. The lesion is mostly hyperintense and contains hypointense foci. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (3,480/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm). The lesion (arrows) is heterogeneous and has a central area of high signal intensity.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b. Atypical benign regenerative nodule. (a) T1-weighted spin-echo MR image (450/15; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm) shows a large, heterogeneous lesion (arrows) in the right lobe. The lesion is mostly hyperintense and contains hypointense foci. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR image (3,480/110; matrix, 200 x 256; field of view, 400 mm; section thickness, 10 mm; gap, <=2 mm). The lesion (arrows) is heterogeneous and has a central area of high signal intensity.

 
An enlarged hepatic artery was identified in 18 of the 19 patients. Doppler US of the portal vein demonstrated antegrade portal flow in seven patients and retrograde portal flow in 12. All but three patients had undergone surgical creation of portosystemic shunts, and the shunt was completely obstructed in five patients at Doppler US and/or contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging. In the three patients without surgical portosystemic shunts, portal flow direction was normal in two patients and reversed in one patient.

Analysis of follow-up images was possible in all patients with benign nodules, and only one patient with histopathologic diagnosis of nodule showed a change in the size and number of lesions. In this patient, the largest lesion enlarged from 3.0 to 7.5 cm during 3-year follow-up.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
HCC Lesions
The association of Budd-Chiari syndrome and HCC is favored by two conditions. First, HCC can cause obstruction of the main hepatic veins or inferior vena cava due to endoluminal invasion by the tumor. This produces an acute or fulminant variant of Budd-Chiari syndrome, which has a poor prognosis (1). Second, HCC can develop in patients with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome and accounts for 0.7% of all the cases of HCC (3). To our knowledge, HCC is most common in patients with membranous obstruction of the vena cava. The prevalence of HCC in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome varies in the literature and is found to be high in Japan (41%), South Africa (48%), and the United States (25%) (9). In other reports from Japan and Taiwan, however, the prevalence is lower (10,11). In a clinical study of 157 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (11), only 6.4% of patients developed HCC during a 15-year follow-up period. This wide variation in the prevalence of HCC in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome may indicate that other factors, such as chronic viral infection, play a role in the development of malignant tumors. In these series evaluating the prevalence of HCC in Budd-Chiari syndrome, imaging data about the tumors was not extensive; however, most tumors were large and heterogeneous. Tumor invasion in the portal vein was also a common finding (3). The findings in our four patients with HCC and Budd-Chiari syndrome were similar to those from previous studies: Tumors were large (mean diameter, 7.3 cm for the largest lesions in each patient and 5.5 cm for all lesions) and had a heterogeneous appearance. Also, tumor invasion in the portal vein was demonstrated in one of our four patients. Only one of the four patients, however, had membranous obstruction of the vena cava confirmed at venography and associated with a myeloproliferative disorder. In the other patients, Budd-Chiari syndrome was secondary to coagulation disorders in one patient and antiphospholipid syndrome in another. In the third patient, Budd-Chiari syndrome was not related to any disorder.

Benign Regenerative Nodules
Benign regenerative nodules have recently been described in the literature in association with Budd-Chiari syndrome (47). As in our series, the regenerative nodules were discovered only in patients with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome, not in patients with acute disease. In some cases studied at imaging, authors showed that these lesions developed during follow-up (10–17 months after diagnosis) (4,12). We also showed that the lesions developed 1–14 years after diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome in 18 of the 19 patients. An analysis of our patients and the literature did not reveal a specific cause for the development of these nodules. In this study and in the cases in the literature, only one patient with membranous obstruction of the vena cava had benign regenerative nodules. Despite the different terms that have been used to designate these benign regenerative nodules (ie, adenomatoid hyperplasia [4], nodular regenerative hyperplasia [5,6], or regenerative nodules [7]), these lesions are pathologically similar (5). No specific location has been identified, but Maia de Sousa et al (5) have suggested that microscopic nodules could be predominantly distributed in the periportal region. Because of the different sizes of these lesions, the term "nodular regenerative hyperplasia" is, as some authors have suggested, probably not appropriate and should be replaced with the term "multiacinar regenerative nodules" according to a recent classification proposed by the International Working Party (5,8). The two most characteristic findings concerning these nodules in the literature and in our series are the number and size of lesions. In most studies, the lesions were found to be numerous. In our study, 15 of 19 patients with benign nodules had more than 10 lesions on imaging studies. In livers removed at transplantation or autopsy, up to 50 nodules have been found (7). As noted in all published articles and most of the patients in the present series, nodule diameter can range from a few millimeters to 4.0 cm (46). In four of our patients, however, the diameter of the largest lesions ranged from 5.0 to 7 cm. In these four patients, more than 10 small nodules were also found in association with larger lesions.

Despite the number of previous studies about Budd-Chiari syndrome, imaging data for benign regenerative nodules in these reports are scanty, with only one report of MR imaging in two cases (4). In our experience, the appearance of benign regenerative nodules varies at US and is either hypo- or hyperechoic. These lesions are usually hyperattenuating in relation to the liver on unenhanced CT scans and strongly enhance at the arterial phase after the injection of contrast material. This hypervascularization was also found in two previous case reports with angiography, in which multiple hypervascular nodular areas were described. To our knowledge, however, it has not been described with CT or MR imaging (5,13). Soyer et al (4) showed hyperintense nodules on T1-weighted MR images and iso- or hyperintense nodules on T2-weighted MR images obtained in two patients. One of these patients had a hypointense rim at the periphery of a nodule. Similarly, in the present study, most lesions were hyperintense on T1-weighted MR images (12 of 16 patients [75%]) and hyper- or isointense on T2-weighted MR images (13 of 15 patients [87%]). Two patients had a nodule surrounded by a peripheral rim. Certain of these imaging features are atypical for benign regenerative nodules, such as hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR images, hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images, and hypervascularization. To our knowledge, hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR images has not been reported in regenerative nodules but has been described in adenomatous hyperplastic nodules or "borderline" lesions in patients with cirrhosis (14). Although the reason for this hyperintense signal remains unclear, it is suggestive of premalignant lesions in patients with cirrhosis. As in other studies, we did not find fat deposits or peliosis in our hyperintense lesions on T1-weighted images. Copper accumulation, however, was not specifically studied.

Hyperintensity on T2-weighted images is not usually found in benign regenerative lesions and is observed in other lesions, including HCC, hepatocellular adenoma, and borderline lesions that contain foci of dysplasia or malignant transformations (14). Hypervascularization is also atypical in benign regenerative nodules. In patients with cirrhosis, Matsui et al (15) showed that the transformation from a predominantly portal blood supply to a predominantly arterial blood supply is suggestive of the malignant transformation of benign regenerative nodules. The findings of Matsui et al were confirmed with a morphologic study showing that angiogenesis occurs in the preneoplastic or early neoplastic stage during the course of hepatocarcinogenesis (16). Hypervascularization of regenerative nodules associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome probably does not have the same pathogenesis as that observed in HCC. In most of our cases, as in the study by Wanless (7), the caliber of the main hepatic artery was larger than that of the splenic artery, which suggests that an increase in arterial hepatic outflow might explain the hypervascularization of these lesions. Usually, the stimulus for liver regeneration is thought to be blood-borne, and prolonged exposure of hepatocytes to the action of hepatopoietins combined with other hepatotrophic factors in the portal blood flow is thought to increase hepatoproliferative activity (4,5). Only seven of our 19 patients with benign regenerative nodules had antegrade portal flow, whereas 12 had retrograde portal flow. This suggests that the cause of benign regenerative nodules is probably a disturbance in hepatic microcirculation secondary to obstruction of the hepatic vein.

The role of the respective changes in the arterial or portal circulation has not been clarified, but similar findings have been observed after congenital or surgical portacaval anastomosis (1719). The first similarity is the development of hyperplastic foci that develop into true nodules. These nodules are large, numerous, and may measure up to 1.0 cm in diameter within 6 months after surgical anastomosis (17). Furthermore, at first they involve predominantly periportal cells (17). In an experimental study of portacaval anastomosis in rats, nodules were detected in all animals 6–12 months after the procedure and resulted in markedly irregular nodularity after 18 months (17). The second similarity is abnormal portal blood flow such as a decrease in portal blood flow secondary to portacaval anastomosis or total deprivation of portal blood in congenital portacaval shunts (20), and the third is an increase in hepatic arterial inflow resulting in the development of multiple arteries with markedly enlarged lumens and thickened walls within the portal triads in congenital and surgical portacaval shunts (19,20).

In patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, the relationship between the development of nodules and portacaval anastomosis may be hypothesized; however, of the 19 patients in this study with benign nodules, three had no shunts and five had complete obstruction of the surgical portacaval anastomosis.

The prevalence of benign regenerative nodules associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome is not known. On the basis of the literature, the prevalence appears to be low; however, many lesions were probably undetected. In a pathologic study of 10 livers removed at transplantation or autopsy (7), all 10 had small, 1.0-mm-diameter nodules and eight to 10 had larger nodules. Furthermore, in our clinical study of 77 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, benign regenerative lesions were detected with imaging techniques in 25%. The true prevalence of benign regenerative lesions, however, is not known, and the fact that a large number of our patients had portosystemic shunts could perhaps increase erroneously the real prevalence.

Our study has several limitations. First, the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically in only half of the patients with benign regenerative nodules. Furthermore, in the patients with benign regenerative nodules proved by means of histopathologic analysis, specimens were obtained only from the largest nodules; the diagnosis of the other lesions was not confirmed with histopathologic examination. In the other patients, however, the lesions were considered to be benign and only patients without change during a follow-up of at least 2 years were included. Absence of change during 2-year follow-up cannot exclude rare forms of slowly growing HCC; however, these lesions are very occasionally encountered. Second, the evolution of benign regenerative nodules cannot be confirmed even change was not observed in 18 of 19 patients after 2–8-year follow-up. Third, this study is retrospective and imaging techniques such as CT or MR imaging were not available to all patients. In most patients, however, lesion vascularization was assessed with either CT or MR imaging.

In conclusion, in our experience, chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome is more often associated with benign regenerative nodules than with HCC. The distinction between these two lesions cannot be made on the basis of signal intensity at MR imaging or lesion hypervascularization. On the basis of our experience and that reported in the literature, benign nodules can be diagnosed with reasonable confidence in patients with more than 10 nodules smaller than 4 cm in diameter at imaging. The hyperattenuation of nodules at unenhanced CT could be another tool for differentiating regenerating nodules from HCC because, in our study, 61% of the regenerating nodules and none of the HCCs were hyperattenuating. In these cases, however, CT or MR imaging follow- up is necessary.


    Acknowledgments
 
We express our gratitude to Didier Mathieu, MD, for reviewing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
Address reprint requests to V.V.

From the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly.

Abbreviation: HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, V.V.; study concepts and design, V.V.; definition of intellectual content, V.V., M.L.; literature research, M.L.; clinical studies, C.V., D.V., J.F.F.; experimental studies, J.B.; data acquisition, A.D., M.L.; data analysis, V.V., M.L.; manuscript preparation and editing, V.V., M.L.; manuscript review, V.V., M.L., A.D., Y.M.

Received December 5, 1997; revision requested February 24, 1998; revision received July 17, 1998; accepted September 23, 1998.
    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Valla D, Benhamou JP. Obstruction of the hepatic veins or suprahepatic inferior vena cava. Dig Dis 1996; 14:99-118.[Medline]
  2. Panis Y, Belghiti J, Valla D, Benhamou JP, Fekete F. Portosystemic shunt in Budd-Chiari syndrome: long-term survival and factors affecting shunt patency in 25 patients in western countries. Surgery 1994; 115:276-281.[Medline]
  3. Takayasu K, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, et al. Radiological study of idiopathic Budd-Chiari syndrome complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of four cases. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 88:249-253.
  4. Soyer P, Lacheheb D, Caudron C, Levesque M. MRI of adenomatous hyperplastic nodules of the liver in Budd-Chiari syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:86-89.[Medline]
  5. Maia de Sousa JM, Portmann B, Williams R. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver and the Budd-Chiari syndrome: case report—review of the literature and reappraisal of pathogenesis. J Hepatol 1991; 12:28-35.[Medline]
  6. Castellano G, Canga F, Solis-Herruzo JA, Colina F, Martinez-Montiel MP, Morillas JD. Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 11:698-702.[Medline]
  7. Wanless IR. Regenerative nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Hepatology 1994; 19:139I.
  8. International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 1995; 22:983-993.[Medline]
  9. Dilawari JB, Bambery P, Chawla Y, et al. Hepatic outflow obstruction (Budd-Chiari syndrome): experience with 177 patients and a review of the literature. Medicine 1994; 73:21-36.[Medline]
  10. Lu CL, Chou YH, Hwang SJ, Chan CY, Lee SD. Membranous obstruction of inferior vena cava in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1995; 10:287-294.[Medline]
  11. Okuda H, Yamagata H, Obata H, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of Budd-Chiari syndrome in Japan. J Hepatol 1995; 22:1-9.[Medline]
  12. Simon DC, Olsen JO. The development of regenerative nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome demonstrated by liver scan. Clin Nucl Med 1985; 10:374-375.[Medline]
  13. Hungerford GD, Hamlyn AN, Lunzer MR, Dick R, Sherlock S. Pseudometastases in the liver: a presentation of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Radiology 1976; 120:627-628.[Abstract]
  14. Choi BI, Takayasu K, Han MC. Small hepatocellular carcinomas and associated nodular lesions of the liver: pathology, pathogenesis and imaging findings. AJR 1993; 160:1177-1187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991; 178:493-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ueda K, Terada T, Nakanuma Y, Matsui O. Vascular supply in adenomatous hyperplasia of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma: a morphometric study. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:619-626.[Medline]
  17. Weinbren K, Washington SLA. Hyperplastic nodules after portacaval anastomosis in rats. Nature 1976; 264:440-442.[Medline]
  18. Dubuisson L, Vonnahme FJ, Stzark F, Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C. Hyperplastic foci in the atrophic liver of rats after portacaval anastomosis. Liver 1985; 5:21-28.[Medline]
  19. McCuskey RS, Vonnahme FJ, Grün M. In vivo and electron microscopic observations of the hepatic microvasculature in the rat following portacaval anastomosis. Hepatology 1983; 3:96-104.[Medline]
  20. Bioulac-Sage P, Saric J, Boussarie L, Balabaub C. Congenital portacaval shunt in rats: liver adaptation to lack of portal vein: a light and electron microscopic study. Hepatology 1985; 5:1183-1189.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
R Moucari, P-E Rautou, D Cazals-Hatem, A Geara, C Bureau, Y Consigny, C Francoz, M-H Denninger, V Vilgrain, J Belghiti, et al.
Hepatocellular carcinoma in Budd-Chiari syndrome: characteristics and risk factors
Gut, June 1, 2008; 57(6): 828 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Willatt, H. K. Hussain, S. Adusumilli, and J. A. Marrero
MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Challenges and Controversies
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 311 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Brancatelli, V. Vilgrain, M. P. Federle, A. Hakime, R. Lagalla, R. Iannaccone, and D. Valla
Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Spectrum of Imaging Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): W168 - W176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
K. Rikitake, T. Itoh, M. Natsuaki, Y. Katayama, S. Ohtsubo, and H. Kataoka
Surgical Repair for Entire Inferior Vena Cava Occlusion in Budd-Chiari Syndrome
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2006; 14(5): e88 - e90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Bargallo, R. Gilabert, C. Nicolau, J. C. Garcia-Pagan, J. R. Ayuso, and C. Bru
Sonography of Budd-Chiari syndrome.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W33 - W41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Zeitoun, G. Brancatelli, M. Colombat, M. P. Federle, D. Valla, T. Wu, C. Degott, and V. Vilgrain
Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis: CT Findings in 18 Adults
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Hussain, I. Syed, H. V. Nghiem, T. D. Johnson, R. C. Carlos, W. J. Weadock, and I. R. Francis
T2-weighted MR Imaging in the Assessment of Cirrhotic Liver
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. A. Krinsky and G. Israel
Nondysplastic Nodules That Are Hyperintense on T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo MR Imaging: Frequency in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Transplantation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1023 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. Brancatelli, M. P. Federle, L. Grazioli, R. Golfieri, and R. Lencioni
Benign Regenerative Nodules in Budd-Chiari Syndrome and Other Vascular Disorders of the Liver: Radiologic-Pathologic and Clinical Correlation
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 847 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Maetani, K. Itoh, H. Egawa, H. Haga, T. Sakurai, N. Nishida, F. Ametani, T. Shibata, T. Kubo, K. Tanaka, et al.
Benign Hepatic Nodules in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: Radiologic--Pathologic Correlation with Emphasis on the Central Scar
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Brancatelli, M. P. Federle, L. Grazioli, R. Golfieri, and R. Lencioni
Large Regenerative Nodules in Budd-Chiari Syndrome and Other Vascular Disorders of the Liver: CT and MR Imaging Findings with Clinicopathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 877 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. L. Baron and M. S. Peterson
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: Screening the Cirrhotic Liver for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with CT and MR Imaging: Opportunities and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S117 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. A. Krinsky, V. S. Lee, N. D. Theise, J. C. Weinreb, N. M. Rofsky, T. Diflo, and L. W. Teperman
Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Dysplastic Nodules in Patients with Cirrhosis: Prospective Diagnosis with MR Imaging and Explantation Correlation
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 445 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Menu, Y.