Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. R.
(Radiology. 1999;211:395-397.)
© RSNA, 1999


Signs in Imaging

The Pseudokidney Sign1

David R. Anderson, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Main Hospital 3rd Fl, 401 N 12th St, Richmond, VA 23298-0615. Received March 13, 1998; revision requested April 24; revision received June 4; accepted June 24. Address reprint requests to the author.

Index terms: Gastrointestinal tract, diseases, 74.73, 75.73 • Gastrointestinal tract, US, 70.12981, 70.12983 • Intussusception, 74.73, 75.73


    APPEARANCE
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The pseudokidney sign, as seen at ultrasonography (US), is composed of a mass that has a reniform appearance, with a central hyperechoic region surrounded by a hypoechoic region (Fig 1).



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. US scan in the sagittal plane demonstrates the pseudokidney sign (arrows) of intussusception anteriorly and the longitudinal axis of the right kidney (arrowheads) posteriorly. White dot in upper left corner indicates that the transducer is oriented toward the patient's head.

 

    EXPLANATION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
This pseudokidney sign can be seen with intussusception, in which the intussusceptum, a portion of the bowel and mesentery, enters the intussuscipiens, the receiving portion of the bowel. The central hyperechoic region may be produced by the mesentery of the intussusceptum, with the hypoechoic portion mainly representing the entering and returning limbs of the intussusceptum with less contribution from the intussuscipiens (1).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Depending on the US scanning plane, the image that demonstrates intussusception can have various appearances. In the sagittal plane, the shape of the intussusception may be reniform, and, hence, the pseudokidney sign is produced (14). Another sagittal appearance is that of a sandwich (5). In the transverse plane, the image can resemble a target, bull's-eye, doughnut, or crescent in a doughnut (15) (Fig 2).



View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Transverse US scan demonstrates the crescent-in-doughnut appearance (long arrow) of intussusception anteriorly and the transverse middle pole of the right kidney (arrowhead) posteriorly. The liver (short arrow) also is seen adjacent to the intussusception and the kidney. White dot in upper left corner indicates that the transducer is oriented toward the patient's right side.

 
When the bowel becomes intussuscepted, a portion of the mesentery and its associated blood vessels become trapped within the intussusception. This restricts venous return and thereby leads to edema of the intussusceptum. Eventually, arterial flow may be restricted; this may lead to bowel necrosis (6). The blood supply of the intussuscipiens is not compromised; therefore, the intussuscipiens does not become edematous (7).

The edematous intussusceptum is hypoechoic at US. The mesentery contains fat, vessels, and lymph nodes that may be scanned by using US. The fat is hyperechoic, and the lymph nodes and blood vessels are hypoechoic (1). These components of the intussusception cause its characteristic US findings, including the pseudokidney sign. In the sagittal scanning plane, the hypoechoic periphery is created by the edematous intussusceptum; the hyperechoic center is created by the mesentery. In the transverse scanning plane, the intussusception may have the appearance of a hypoechoic doughnut near the apex of the intussusceptum where the bulk of the appearance is created by the edematous bowel of the intussusceptum without contribution from the mesentery (1,8). At the more proximal portion of the intussusception, the hyperechoic mesentery is included with the intussusceptum, along with hypoechoic lymph nodes and blood vessels. This complex, together with the hypoechoic, edematous intussusceptum, creates the crescent-in-doughnut sign (1).

Although the US pseudokidney and doughnut signs of intussusception are highly sensitive and specific, they are not pathognomonic. Other causes of bowel wall edema, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, midgut volvulus, and sigmoid volvulus, may have similar US findings (8). False-positive findings, including feces in the colon, perforated Meckel diverticulum with malrotation and Ladd bands, psoas muscle, and hematoma, have been reported (5). The finding on transverse US scans of a hyperechoic crescent caused by mesenteric fat, together with hypoechoic foci caused by lymph nodes or blood vessels, is very characteristic of intussusception and may help to eliminate false-positive cases (1,9). A very thin (<6-mm) hypoechoic rim may help to distinguish hyperechoic feces from intussusception (5).

Color Doppler US may have a role in estimating the reducibility of an intussusception and in predicting bowel ischemia. When visualized, color signal may be uniformly distributed throughout the hyperechoic central and hypoechoic peripheral portions of the intussusceptum (10). Color signal within the intussusceptum appears to be a very good predictor of reducibility. Likewise, lack of color signal suggests that surgical intervention is likely to be needed. An intussusceptum without color signal may have associated necrosis, but this is not always true.

In four series totaling 225 intussusceptions, color Doppler US demonstrated blood flow in 204 (91%) of the 225 intussusceptions. Surgical intervention was required for 22 (11%) of the 204 intussusceptions with demonstrable blood flow versus for 17 (81%) of the 21 intussusceptions without demonstrable blood flow. Eight (47%) of these 17 cases without blood flow were found to involve necrotic bowel (6,7,10,11).

Intussusception is a common abdominal emergency in early childhood. Idiopathic intussusception occurs in two to four babies per 1,000 live births and is often associated with viral or other gastrointestinal conditions that cause enlargement of intestinal intramural lymphoid tissue. Seventy-five percent of intussusceptions occur in patients younger than 2 years, and boys are affected twice as often as girls. Up to 90% of cases are idiopathic, without a pathologic lead point (12). Pathologic lead points occur most frequently in infants younger than 3 months and in children older than 3 years (3). A variety of lead points have been reported, including Meckel diverticulum, duplication cyst, polyps, periappendicitis, polypoid hemangioma, Burkitt lymphoma, and ectopic pancreas (12,13). Coagulopathies and Henoch-Schönlein purpura also may have a role in intussusception (12).

Intussusception is much less common in adults, who represent 5% of all patients with this condition. In a series of 58 intussusceptions in adults, 27 (47%) were caused by malignancies. Therefore, surgical resection is the primary management for intussusception in adults (14).

Ileocolic is the most common form of intussusception (75%–95%) (2). Ileoileocolic intussusceptions are the second most common, followed by ileoileal and colocolic intussusceptions (2,4). In two series totaling 96 intussusceptions, 87 (91%) were ileocolic, and the other nine (9%) were ileoileocolic (15,16). About 90% of intussusceptions are found in the transverse hepatic flexure and ascending portions of the colon; the majority are found in the transverse colon (15).

The signs and symptoms of intussusception include abdominal pain, bloody stool, emesis, a palpable abdominal mass, and diarrhea. The pain may be intermittent and cause the child to curl the knees into the abdomen. Sometimes, a depression in the right lower region of the abdomen may be palpable when the cecum is drawn into the upper part of the abdomen secondary to the intussusception (12). Less than 50% of patients exhibit the classic clinical triad of abdominal pain, red currant jelly stool, and a palpable abdominal mass (9). Other signs and symptoms may include restlessness, pallor, and fever (15,16).

The radiographic diagnosis of intussusception is generally made by using conventional radiography, contrast or air enema examination, and US. Several publications (2,3,9,13,1517) have addressed the former two diagnostic methods. US with recognition of the pseudokidney sign may be up to 100% sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of intussusception (10). Therefore, the pseudokidney sign and its correlate signs may be very helpful in the successful diagnosis of this common pediatric abdominal emergency.


    References
 TOP
 APPEARANCE
 EXPLANATION
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. del-Pozo G, Albillos JC, Tejedor D. Intussusception: US findings with pathologic correlation: the crescent-in-doughnut sign. Radiology 1996; 199:688-692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bisset IGS, II, Kirks DR. Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis and therapy. Radiology 1988; 168:141-145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Merten DF. Practical approaches to pediatric gastrointestinal radiology. Radiol Clin North Am 1993; 31:1395-1407.[Medline]
  4. Sivit CJ. Gastrointestinal emergencies in older infants and children. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35:865-877.[Medline]
  5. Verschelden P, Filiatrault D, Garel L, et al. Intussusception in children: reliability of US in diagnosis—a prospective study. Radiology 1992; 184:741-744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lam AH, Firman K. Value of sonography including color Doppler in the diagnosis and management of long standing intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22:112-114.[Medline]
  7. Lagalla R, Caruso G, Novara V, Derchi LE, Cardinale AE. Color Doppler ultrasonography in pediatric intussusception. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:171-174.[Abstract]
  8. Swishchuk LE, Hayden CK, Boulden T. Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and an explanation of the doughnut and pseudokidney signs. Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15:388-391.[Medline]
  9. Daneman A, Alton DJ. Intussusception: issues and controversies related to diagnosis and reduction. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 4:743-756.
  10. Lim HK, Bae SH, Lee KH, Seo GS, Yoon GS. Assessment of reducibility of ileocolic intussusception in children: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1994; 191:781-785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kong MS, Wong HF, Lin SL, Chung JL, Lin JN. Factors related to detection of blood flow by color Doppler ultrasonography in intussusception. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16:141-144.[Abstract]
  12. Rudolph AM, Hoffman JIE, Rudolph CD, Sagan P, eds. Rudolph's pediatrics 19th ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange, 1991; 1034.
  13. Miller SF, Landes AB, Dautenhahn LW, et al. Intussusception: ability of fluoroscopic images obtained during air enemas to depict lead points and other abnormalities. Radiology 1995; 197:493-496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997; 226:134-138.[Medline]
  15. Peh WCG, Khong PL, Chan KL, et al. Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception using Hartmann's solution. AJR 1996; 167:1237-1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gorenstein A, Raucher A, Serour F, Witzling M, Katz R. Intussusception in children: reduction with repeated delayed air enema. Radiology 1998; 206:721-724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kirks D. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric intussusception: how far should we push our radiologic techniques? (editorial). Radiology 1994; 191:622-623.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
N. Mumoli, G. Niccoli, M. Cei, and C. Bartolomei
The Pseudokidney Sign
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 2008; 24(4): 257 - 259.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE