Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alaimo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alaimo, R.
(Radiology. 1999;211:592.)
© RSNA, 1999


Letters to the Editor

Efficiency in Academic Radiology Departments

Seymour Sprayregen, MD, E. Stephen Amis, Jr, MD, Ellen L. Wolf, MD and Richard Alaimo, BS

1 Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467

Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Dr Seltzer and colleagues (1) in the November 1998 issue of Radiology regarding the ability of academic radiology departments to respond to market pressures to reduce costs and improve efficiency. Dr Seltzer and colleagues, while perhaps not intending to do so, sent a mixed message. On the one hand, they stated, "Academic radiology departments have proved that they `can do more with less' over a sustained period" and "We believe that [our] data contradict the commonly held belief that . . . academic radiology departments cannot respond to market forces and become less expensive and more productive." On the other hand, they stated, "it appears that, on a statistical basis, the major driver toward productivity improvements is not a result of any deliberate intervention, but rather is due to the substantial growth in [relative value units] per examination." They also stated that cost reductions were achieved primarily by combining the purchasing power of two large hospitals.

In the April 1998 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology (2), we described the reengineering of a radiology department in an academic institution. It is clear that our interventions led to decreased labor and nonlabor costs to the hospital, with a decreased cost per examination, increased efficiency in performing examinations, an improved quality of examinations, increased professional charge capture, decreased report turnaround time, and an improved perception of the department by referring physicians (2).

References

  1. Seltzer SE, Saini S, Bramson RT, et al. Can academic radiology departments become more efficient and cost less?. Radiology 1998; 209:405-410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sprayregen S, Amis ES, Jr, Wolf EL, Alaimo R. Reengineering a radiology department in an academic institution. AJR 1998; 170:851-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alaimo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alaimo, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE